Price Relative To Quality Images

Posted on 12/26/2007 by Jim Pickerell | Printable Version | Comments (3)

Something to think about as we move into the New Year.

Many people want to talk about how to get better prices for better quality images. When we're talking about stock pictures, this concept is irrelevant. Unfortunately, quality has absolutely nothing to do with what a customer will pay for an image. (The ability to produce quality images does have relevance when choosing a photographer for an assignment, but it doesn't relate to stock.)

Focusing on this issue makes photographers and stock agents feel good. All say we should be paid more for the hard work we put into images. All will probably agree that in general, we are getting less now than we were five or 10 years ago for image use, particularly taking inflation into account. But despite complaint, we will not get getting higher prices for the images we license.

For the customer, quality is measured in terms of what is the best image for his particular needs. The customer could care less about how much it costs to produce the image, how difficult it was to produce, how professional the models were or the reputation of the photographer. All the customer cares about is finding the image that fits the project parameters at an affordable price. Depending on the project (the type of usage), that price may vary greatly.

Thus, what we need to do is carefully define types of usage, and establish fair and reasonable prices (for both buyer and seller) for each such usage. To a degree, that is what the RM side of the business has tried to do for decades. But in certain areas, it has failed to keep up with new uses and the way certain business have changed. As a result, some price strategies have gotten out of line.

In addition, pricing based on usage has gotten so complex that customers are rebelling against its complexity. We need to stop worrying about getting better prices for "better quality." Instead, we need to focus on finding ways to simplify and make it easier for customers to determine the price for a particular use, without discarding the concept of pricing based on usage.

Discussing the issue of getting higher prices for "better quality" images is a waste of time. We are deluding ourselves. In 2008, we should be talking about how to earn the most money for the images we produce and license.

Copyright © 2007 Jim Pickerell. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-461-7627, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

Jim Pickerell is founder of, an online newsletter that publishes daily. He is also available for personal telephone consultations on pricing and other matters related to stock photography. He occasionally acts as an expert witness on matters related to stock photography. For his current curriculum vitae go to:  


  • Jean-pierre Lescourret Posted Dec 27, 2007
    You certainly not a photographer to talk such nonsense . The complexity to determine a prize is not for the customer but for the photographer . The better quality images is the only argument we have to sell RM images, if not, it is in the interest of the customer to buy RF or Microstock .

  • Fred Voetsch Posted Dec 27, 2007
    It seems to me that the purpose of "Selling Stock" is not to represent photographers but to provide insight into the business of selling stock photography and this article provides a valuable insight that reflects a truth about stock photography that photographers need to be aware of.


  • Froggy 451 Posted Dec 27, 2007
    Do we have to pay to read such a b... sh... ?

Post Comment

Please log in or create an account to post comments.

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive email notification when new stories are posted.

Follow Us

Free Stuff

Stock Photo Pricing: The Future
In the last two years I have written a lot about stock photo pricing and its downward slide. If you have time over the holidays you may want to review some of these stories as you plan your strategy ...
Read More
Future Of Stock Photography
If you’re a photographer that counts on the licensing of stock images to provide a portion of your annual income the following are a few stories you should read. In the past decade stock photography ...
Read More
Blockchain Stories
The opening session at this year’s CEPIC Congress in Berlin on May 30, 2018 is entitled “Can Blockchain be applied to the Photo Industry?” For those who would like to know more about the existing blo...
Read More
2017 Stories Worth Reviewing
The following are links to some 2017 and early 2018 stories that might be worth reviewing as we move into the new year.
Read More
Stories Related To Stock Photo Pricing
The following are links to stories that deal with stock photo pricing trends. Probably the biggest problem the industry has faced in recent years has been the steady decline in prices for the use of ...
Read More
Stock Photo Prices: The Future
This story is FREE. Feel free to pass it along to anyone interested in licensing their work as stock photography. On October 23rd at the DMLA 2017 Conference in New York there will be a panel discuss...
Read More
Important Stock Photo Industry Issues
Here are links to recent stories that deal with three major issues for the stock photo industry – Revenue Growth Potential, Setting Bottom Line On Pricing and Future Production Sources.
Read More
Recent Stories – Summer 2016
If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
Read More
Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
Read More
Finding The Right Image
Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
Read More

More from Free Stuff