Random Thoughts 3

Posted on 2/9/1999 by Jim Pickerell | Printable Version | Comments (0)



February 9, 1999

Policy Change At TSM??

The Stock Market has always been a strong advocate of photographer

exclusive contracts. Richard Steedman has consistently argued that an

agency should represent the whole body of work of a photographer, that an

agency will always promote a photographer's best work, and that if certain

images aren't selected for promotion by the agency then they shouldn't be

promoted anywhere else.

However, now that there are so many major stock producers dissatisfied with

the representation they are getting from some of the other major agencies,

we have learned that TSM is making some exceptions to this rule and is

willing to accept some photographers on a non-exclusive basis.

When the recent Stock Market 12 catalog came out one of TSM's major

producers immediately spotted what he was sure was a John Lund picture

above the name of John Martin. Lund, of course, has been a major producer

for Tony Stone Images for years. Fearful that his agency was being

deceived by some unscrupulous photographer who had ripped-off John Lund's

image and that the agency was possibly involved in a copyright

infringement, the photographer immediately called TSM.

He was told, yes it was a John Lund picture, that John Martin is the name

Lund uses for pictures he has placed with TSM and that TSI is fully aware

that Lund is supplying some images to The Stock Market.

Lund also got a call from an art director he has worked for who said, "I

don't know who this John Martin guy is in the new Stock Market catalog, but

he is ripping you off."

Lund is not the only one. We understand that Tim Davis and Renee Lynn are

now also represented by both Tony Stone Images and The Stock Market. There

may be others.

Changes At Corbis

Holli Morton who was Director of Sales and Personnel at WestLight has

retired. Her primary goal had been to fully integrate WestLight into the

Corbis system and that was deemed completed on January 11th. Helen Menzies

who was with Corbis in the UK has been brought to the LA office as sales

manager and is serving, at least temporarily, as director of the Los

Angeles operations.

A new "Creative Freedom 3" catalog and CD of mostly WestLight images has

been delivered to customers under the Corbis Images logo. The WestLight

identity has totally disappeared from all promotional material.

The Digital Stock identity has also disappeared as a result of the integration.

Founders of Digital Stock, Matthew Klipstein and Charles Smith are wrapping up

their relations with the company and will be leaving shortly.

The new Corbis Images site has gotten rid of a lot

of the consumer offerings that still litter Corbis's main site. Users have

a choice of looking for Royalty Free images or Licensed Rights images. If

they choose licensed rights they get to search through a single database

that contains all the WestLight images, the primary Corbis file supplied by

individual photographers direct to Corbis, as well as images from Outline,

LGI and Bettmann. This site should be a much more user friendly offering

for graphic designers than the previous site.

I have recently heard that at least one photographer who has been with

Corbis for about four years has paid off his advance and is now receiving

actual payments for royalties. His share of gross sales for 1998 was up

significantly and represented over 45% of his total advance. Other

photographers report that sales in last quarter of 1998 showed marked

improvement. Maybe clients are finally finding the Corbis on-line site..

According to Peter Howe the company structure has changed and they are

taking in fewer images in Bellevue and London. This resulted in the

departure of three editors from Bellevue and one from London. New material

is now being edited at the various divisions - WestLight, Digital Stock,

Outline, LGI and Bettmann.

In theory the photographers who originally supplied material to Corbis are

still shooting and could continue to pump new material into the files.

However, many are so disillusioned that few seem to send in new material.

Some have been told not to make new submissions. I also hear that Corbis

is rethinking the $4.50 per image deal and won't offer that anymore.

Rights of Privacy

Ever wonder how the UK press gets away with publishing images of

celebrities that might get photographers sued here in the US. According to

lawyer Charles Swan of The Simkins Partnership in London there is no

"rights of privacy" or "rights of publicity" as in the US and most of the

rest of Europe. It is not unlawful, per se, to exploit someone else's

image for commercial purposes without permission.

Fiduciary Responsibilities

How does your agent handle payments for use of your images?

Some Agents have an account into which they deposit all royalty payments

and a separate account for operating their business.

When they receive payments from clients the entire check is deposited into

the royalty account. They don't remove anything from this account until

they have paid their photographers their share of the monies. At that

point they also pay the agency's share of monies into their general

operating account. All agency operating costs are paid out of the general


That's the way your monies should be handled. Most agencies that operate

in this manner pay monthly because they don't want to wait a long time to

begin using money they have collected from clients. But, just because they

pay monthly isn't necessarily a guarantee that they pay you first before

they start using money out of the royalty account.

The downside for the agent is that he can't use the money as soon as

collected. Assume the agent pays photographer commissions on the first day

of the month, based on all monies received the previous month. If a royalty

payment arrives on the 1st or 2nd of the month the agent has to wait a

whole month until he can start using his share of that money. For many

this temptation is too great. On average for the agents who pay monthly

the money sets in the agents royalty account for 15 days before he can

begin using it.

Nevertheless, the photographer's "agent" has a fiduciary responsibility to

preserve the independence of the photographer's funds versus that portion

that belongs to the agent.

Some agents write checks at the end of the month and then hold the checks

until they have cash in their account to cover the checks.

Recently, a photographer noted his checks from his agent were arriving

almost two months after they were dated. When he questioned the agent the

agent came back with the following justification.

"As I see it, we are one of the few agencies left that still writes checks

on a monthly basis. Maybe we are the dumb ones." For almost two years

"we've been holding the monthly royalty checks for one month before mailing

them. At the end of the year cash is a bit tight so sometimes the mailing

gets delayed a couple days beyond that month hold time."

This agent isn't bothered at all that he has no funds to cover the checks

he is writing. Somehow he believes he is fulfilling his responsibility by

writing the check and that it makes no difference when he hands that check

over to the photographer.

On the other hand, if you think one month holding time is bad, consider the

situation of Philip Chudy with Pictor. See story 197 .)

And it is just as bad when the agent doesn't write checks or report sales

at all, as Picture Perfect did. See story 192 .)

Just because the agent has a separate royalty account doesn't mean it is

used in the way it was intended. When I led a group of photographers in an

audit of Uniphoto in 1990 we discovered that they had a separate

photographer account into which they put all royalty checks. The problem

was that whenever their operating account got low the then owners (who are

no longer there) freely dipped into the photographer's account to pay

current bills. They did this with absolutely no consideration as to how

much of this money was then owned to photographers.

When we totaled up their funds in early October, 1990, they owed

photographers in excess of $200,000 for royalties collected in the previous

quarter. They had no money in their operating account and less that

$25,000 in their photographer royalty account. On top of this, payday for

their employees was two days away and that would eat up most of the

$25,000. But the owner was driving a Porsche.

Copyright © 1999 Jim Pickerell. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-461-7627, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

Jim Pickerell is founder of www.selling-stock.com, an online newsletter that publishes daily. He is also available for personal telephone consultations on pricing and other matters related to stock photography. He occasionally acts as an expert witness on matters related to stock photography. For his current curriculum vitae go to: http://www.jimpickerell.com/Curriculum-Vitae.aspx.  


Be the first to comment below.

Post Comment

Please log in or create an account to post comments.

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive email notification when new stories are posted.

Follow Us

Free Stuff

Stock Photo Pricing: The Future
In the last two years I have written a lot about stock photo pricing and its downward slide. If you have time over the holidays you may want to review some of these stories as you plan your strategy ...
Read More
Future Of Stock Photography
If you’re a photographer that counts on the licensing of stock images to provide a portion of your annual income the following are a few stories you should read. In the past decade stock photography ...
Read More
Blockchain Stories
The opening session at this year’s CEPIC Congress in Berlin on May 30, 2018 is entitled “Can Blockchain be applied to the Photo Industry?” For those who would like to know more about the existing blo...
Read More
2017 Stories Worth Reviewing
The following are links to some 2017 and early 2018 stories that might be worth reviewing as we move into the new year.
Read More
Stories Related To Stock Photo Pricing
The following are links to stories that deal with stock photo pricing trends. Probably the biggest problem the industry has faced in recent years has been the steady decline in prices for the use of ...
Read More
Stock Photo Prices: The Future
This story is FREE. Feel free to pass it along to anyone interested in licensing their work as stock photography. On October 23rd at the DMLA 2017 Conference in New York there will be a panel discuss...
Read More
Important Stock Photo Industry Issues
Here are links to recent stories that deal with three major issues for the stock photo industry – Revenue Growth Potential, Setting Bottom Line On Pricing and Future Production Sources.
Read More
Recent Stories – Summer 2016
If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
Read More
Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
Read More
Finding The Right Image
Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
Read More

More from Free Stuff