A photographer recently called to my attention to a keywording anomaly that those who want their images found might want to consider. The photographer said that when he prepares for a trip to another country he searches some of the popular photo websites for the country name along with the keyword “released.”
The theory is that customers who need model released images might use “released” in their keyword searches. If there aren’t many people images with released as a keyword, it gives him a better idea of what to shoot.
I decided to do a few searches of Getty, Shutterstock (SS), iStock and Alamy for particular countries or cities and the word "people." Then, I added "released" to narrow the same search. The results are very revealing.
|
Getty |
Getty |
|
SS |
SS |
|
iStock |
iStock |
|
Alamy |
Alamy |
|
People |
People |
|
People |
People |
|
People |
People |
|
People |
People |
|
|
Released |
|
|
Released |
|
|
Released |
|
|
Released |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bermuda |
674 |
2 |
|
416 |
0 |
|
184 |
0 |
|
1,737 |
4 |
Japan |
168,479 |
3 |
|
136,732 |
13 |
|
44,915 |
45 |
|
181,401 |
351 |
China |
170,409 |
184 |
|
407,594 |
45 |
|
75,608 |
44 |
|
312,459 |
304 |
India |
100,309 |
127 |
|
73,986 |
34 |
|
49,831 |
51 |
|
251,188 |
540 |
Israel |
9,255 |
24 |
|
17,652 |
11 |
|
5,014 |
10 |
|
42,940 |
276 |
London |
110,016 |
249 |
|
82,466 |
18 |
|
27,553 |
27 |
|
269,062 |
458 |
Berlin |
30,100 |
38 |
|
12,961 |
0 |
|
13,784 |
15 |
|
106,803 |
325 |
Paris |
42,005 |
55 |
|
41,835 |
14 |
|
15,326 |
2 |
|
114,496 |
146 |
Turkey |
22,029 |
43 |
|
38,544 |
16 |
|
32,757 |
67 |
|
59,787 |
180 |
Italy |
118,997 |
216 |
|
123,275 |
143 |
|
62,623 |
82 |
|
281,281 |
2,392 |
Spain |
116,870 |
369 |
|
76,721 |
19 |
|
36,606 |
42 |
|
305,964 |
784 |
Mexico |
32,015 |
78 |
|
15,273 |
15 |
|
8,245 |
15 |
|
74,565 |
1,052 |
Rio de Janeiro |
10,526 |
18 |
|
7,626 |
1 |
|
4,472 |
1 |
|
15,996 |
8 |
Note that while Getty has many fewer images in its Creative collection than Shutterstock (10 to 12 million vs. over 70 million) it usually has more images on the subjects searched than Shutterstock. It is also very competitive in terms of numbers with Alamy that also has around 70 million images. It is also interesting to compare Alamy with Shutterstock. Both have about the same number of images in their collections, but for these particular searches Alamy tends to have much higher returns.
On Getty, Shutterstock and iStock, if the images have people in them they are supposed to be releases. I suspect that many that are not marked as released do actually have releases. But, the word released was not used as a keyword.
Customers that only want to see released images will have great difficulty in determining whether a particular image is released, or not. On the other hand, it is definitely not safe for the customer to assume that every image of people in the Getty, Shutterstock or iStock collections has an adequate release.
It is also interesting to see the kind of images that are included in the “released” collection. Many have no people in them at all. Thus, it is difficult to see how they come up in a search for people. A number of photographers seem to think that as long as you can’t see a face, then it is OK to mark an image as released. There as shots of large groups of people taken from the rear that are marked released. I also found some pictures of statues that were marked released.
The next time you're keywording it may be useful to add that little word. The photographer who called my attention to this issue says he has “a few images that are consistent sellers” that he attributes to the fact that he has uses "released" as a keyword. Thus, in at least some cases his work is competing against many fewer images.