Analysis Of Portfolios At Fotolia And Adobe Stock

Posted on 6/10/2019 by Robert Kneschke | Printable Version | Comments (0)

A few months ago, I evaluated which countries most Shutterstock providers come from.

Today, there should be some similar analysis of Adobe Stock's data, or Fotolia, because although the portfolios on both websites are identical, Adobe Stock will unfortunately see less information about it.

In total, data from over 462,000 vendors with a total of over 137 million files in the portfolio were analyzed. As a provider, anyone who has at least one file online counts.



The first thing we want to do is address the question of how big most portfolios are. To this end, I divided the portfolios into groups of ten-potencies.

More than 60% of all active portfolios have only ten or fewer images. At the other end of the spectrum, there is only one portfolio of more than one million images, that of Africa Studio with over 1.3 million images. After all, 64 vendors still make it to portfolios with more than a hundred thousand files.



Unfortunately, it is also not taken into account that some large providers have even more than one portfolio. Africa Studio, for example, has another portfolio linked above, called "New Africa" with over 175,000 images, and the Irish production company Wavebreak Media has at least six portfolios (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6) with a combined total of more than 800,000 images, but the two largest portfolios contain "only" a total of 310,000 images.

Images In Number Of % Total
Portfolio Portfolios Images
1 98,088 21.20%
2 to 10 183,268 39.61%
11 to 100 111,727 24.15%
101 to 1,000 47,647 10.30%
1,001 to 10,000 19,882 4.30%
10,001 to 100,000 2,006 0.43%
100,001 to 1,000,000 64 0.01%
over 1,000,000 1 0%
     
Total 462,683 100%
     

Let's take a look at how many vendors there are that have reached which each ranking. The second column is the number of career sales with Fotolia or Adobe Stock that each contributor must have to reach the rank. Obviously, those who have been with Fotolia the longest are likely to have the most sales. This chart is in no way indicative of recent sales trend for any of the contributors.



Ranking Sales Required Number Average Portfolio % Total
  to Qualify for Rank Portfolios Portfolio Total Results
Diamond over 1,000,000 3 575,527 1,726,581 1.26%
Ruby 250,000 to 999,999 40 117,405 4,696,200 3.42%
Sapphire 100,000 to 249,999 218 36,495 7,955,910 5.80%
Emerald 25,000 to 99,999 1,388 14,048 19,498,624 14.23%
Gold 10,000 to 24,999 2,522 7,626 19,232,772 14.04%
Silver 1,000 to 9,999 10,486 4,040 42,363,440 30.93%
Bronze 100 to 999 7,687 2,278 17,510,986 12.78%
White Less than 99 321,614 14 4,502,596 3.28%
Infinite   84 11,754 987,336 0.72%
Empty   118,635 157 18,625,695 13.60%
           
Total   462,677 296 136,952,392 1
           

Those who are attentive will notice the "Empty" column. These providers have portfolios of between about 20 – 940 images but no ranking had been assigned to them in the data we were able to collect. Experience has shown that portfolios of this size would have to be spread halfway evenly between the SIlver, Bronze and White rankings with some "Infinite" outliers in between due to criteria such as portfolio size, age of the portfolio, etc. There were very few "Infinite" portfolios with much larger average size that had not been assigned a ranking.

The mean values for silver and bronze in the list could be real as slightly below the values represented, for White something above that.

With 261 vendors having scored more than 100,000 downloads, the group of those who generate a lot of revenue is quite manageable. Even if we add the Emerald Ranking with more than 25,000 downloads, we only have 1649 providers. So the large proportion of sales (0.36% or one-third of 1%) go to relatively fewer providers. 71% of the providers have less than 1,000 sales and for many this is over a period of years. 69% of providers have less than 100 sales.

Logically, there is a correlation between portfolio size and downloads. That's why you can also see in the table above how big a typical portfolio is within a ranking. This also shows that my portfolio of just under 39,000 images and Ruby status has sold above average in recent years, because statistically I would have to have more than 117,000 images online to have that status.

Now let's look at the countries from which the most successful providers come. For this I only took into account the 1649 providers with more than 25,000 downloads each.

Here you can see the distribution of countries and their percentage weighting within this criteria (emerald status upwards).

Country Position in Ranking Percent
  (Emerald to Diamond)  
Germany 240 14.55%
Russia Federation 213 12.92%
Ukraine 140 8.49%
USA 138 8.37%
France 89 5.4%
Japan 74 4.49%
Italy 68 4.12%
Poland 57 3.46%
Thailand 52 3.15%
Great Britian 48 2.91%
Spain 44 2.67%
Serbia 42 2.55%
Belarus 39 2.37%
Czech Republic 36 2.18%
Romania 31 1.88%
Canada 24 1.46%
Latvia 21 1.27%
Austria 16 0.97%
Turkey 15 0.91%
China 15 0.91%
Moldova 15 0.91%
Slovakia 11 0.67%
Estonia 10 0.61%
Netherlands 10 0.61%
Bulgaria 10 0.61%
Other 51 Countries 191 11.58%
     
Total 1,649 1

Here, the European origin of the picture agency Fotolia becomes clear, especially in comparison to this Shutterstock list.

By far the most top sellers come from Germany, the founding country of France is ranked 5th (instead of 20th place as at Shutterstock). After that, the large share of Eastern countries can be noticed, most notably Russia and Ukraine, followed by Serbia, Belarus, the Czech Republic and Romania. The lower wage and production costs make it particularly attractive for photographers of these countries to sell their pictures worldwide in euros or US dollars.

The large proportion of European countries – six of the most common countries are European – of well-selling suppliers is also historically explained: Fotolia had placed a very high value on localization at the time. Almost every European country had received its own country office early on, the website was quickly translated into many national languages and the photographers were encouraged to dismiss in the local language.

The region and the language of the saying were also very relevant when displaying the search hits. For example, a German customer was more likely to see pictures of German photographers and with German search terms. With the takeover by Adobe, the regional focus at Adobe Stock has decreased significantly, which is why the European photographers, especially the German ones, are now increasingly complaining about sales declines.

For fun, I took a closer look at the data of the German photographers, because this is a German blog. According to this, German photographers are responsible for about 3 million images and the average German successful portfolio has about 10,000 images online. The above restrictions see "blank" also apply here, but if we take the 14.55% as a guideline, it would be a total of about 5.7 million images of German photographers.


Copyright © 2019 Robert Kneschke. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-461-7627, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

Comments

Be the first to comment below.

Post Comment

Please log in or create an account to post comments.

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive email notification when new stories are posted.

Follow Us

Free Stuff

Stock Photo Pricing: The Future
In the last two years I have written a lot about stock photo pricing and its downward slide. If you have time over the holidays you may want to review some of these stories as you plan your strategy ...
Read More
Future Of Stock Photography
If you’re a photographer that counts on the licensing of stock images to provide a portion of your annual income the following are a few stories you should read. In the past decade stock photography ...
Read More
Blockchain Stories
The opening session at this year’s CEPIC Congress in Berlin on May 30, 2018 is entitled “Can Blockchain be applied to the Photo Industry?” For those who would like to know more about the existing blo...
Read More
2017 Stories Worth Reviewing
The following are links to some 2017 and early 2018 stories that might be worth reviewing as we move into the new year.
Read More
Stories Related To Stock Photo Pricing
The following are links to stories that deal with stock photo pricing trends. Probably the biggest problem the industry has faced in recent years has been the steady decline in prices for the use of ...
Read More
Stock Photo Prices: The Future
This story is FREE. Feel free to pass it along to anyone interested in licensing their work as stock photography. On October 23rd at the DMLA 2017 Conference in New York there will be a panel discuss...
Read More
Important Stock Photo Industry Issues
Here are links to recent stories that deal with three major issues for the stock photo industry – Revenue Growth Potential, Setting Bottom Line On Pricing and Future Production Sources.
Read More
Recent Stories – Summer 2016
If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
Read More
Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
Read More
Finding The Right Image
Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
Read More

More from Free Stuff