Pixabay Knowingly Distributes Stolen Images For Free

Posted on 11/4/2020 by Robert Kneschke | Printable Version | Comments (0)

Why photographers give away their pictures on platforms such as Pixabay remains mostly incomprehensible to me even after this article.

Sometimes, however, the authors do not even know that someone else is illegally offering their images for free.

So today I came across this profile on the free image platform Pixabay. The user with the number "18371568" offers 47 images, mostly illustrations and vectors, but also some photos that, according to Pixabay, have been downloaded over 159,000 times so far, although all images were only uploaded between October 7th and 18th, 2020.



Image 1

As you can see from the icon at the top left of the images, 43 of the 47 images were even "featured" by Pixabay, that is, prominently advertised on the start page etc. and preferably displayed in searches.



Image 2

The only stupid thing is: This account cannot possibly be the author, because the pictures belong to different artists, who usually offer their works on microstock agencies for payment.

I only found out the respective authors of the first 12 images by means of a five-minute Google Images search and placed them as names over the images (see above).



Here are the links to the originals in the first three rows from the top left:

https://www.istockphoto.com/de/vektor/mehrere-kulturen-kinder-träger-maske-gm1224328667-359950165
https://de.depositphotos.com/serie/392605140.html?qview=409176218
https://www.dreamstime.com/portrait-arabian-saudi-businessman-dark-blue-studio-background-man-using-smartphone-paying-bill-online-shopping-image151077695
https://stock.adobe.com/379654894
https://www.freepik.com/free-vector/thank-you-doctors-nurses-concept_7604989.htm
https://de.depositphotos.com/vector-images/bottles-crate.html?qview=408450016
https://www.bigstockphoto.com/de/image-372910054/stock-vektorgrafik-election-or-referendum-campaign-citizens-voting-for-candidates%2C-inserting-survey-form-to-ballot-box
https://stock.adobe.com/378108299
https://www.istockphoto.com/de/foto/versorgung-von-produkte-auf-bestellung-oder-spende w% C3% A4hrend-ein-epidemie-gm1221417252-358023543
https://stock.adobe.com/352903845
https://www.dreamstime.com/vector-pop-art-girl-meditates-lotus-position-vector-pop-art-blonde-girl-sitting-closed-eyes-lotus-position-image123880373
https://es.123rf.com/photo_48324708_ni%C3%B1o-y-ni%C3%B1a-por-el-libro-de-n%C3%BAmeros-y-alfabetos-ilustraci%C3%B3n.html

It is reasonable to assume that Pixabay is aware that something is wrong here, because the uploader is marked as an "Inactive account". However, this does not seem to prevent Pixabay from illegally offering the images for free and thus distributing them more than 159,000 times.

(What exactly an "inactive account" should mean if the images are still freely available, I asked Pixabay by email. So far there has been no answer, if one arrives, I will submit it here.)

[UPDATE 11/4/2020: Pixabay answered my question: “Hello Robert, Most of their images were copied from other sources. Hence, we had the account de-activated. Regards "

This means that it is official that Pixabay deliberately offers images for download that they are not allowed to offer. That's why I changed the heading from a question to a statement])

The most popular picture at the top left alone has been downloaded almost 10,000 times. The advertisement for iStock, which ironically appears under the image for the financing of Pixabay, already seems like a mockery.

If you actually download an image, the information comes that you can voluntarily use the name "B Ban" as a source:

Image 3

Wikipedia already knows in their Pixabay article how such image thefts can happen:

"Risks
The images are uploaded by anonymous users. There is therefore the risk that the uploader does not even have the copyright. Pixabay does not guarantee that the uploaded images are free from third party rights. Since the upload is anonymous, users who have been warned cannot make recourse to this person and are therefore left with the costs of the warning”.

This example shows once again why free images must be met with more than a clear portion of skepticism.


Copyright © 2020 Robert Kneschke. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-461-7627, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

Comments

Be the first to comment below.

Post Comment

Please log in or create an account to post comments.

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive email notification when new stories are posted.

Follow Us

Free Stuff

Stock Photo Pricing: The Future
In the last two years I have written a lot about stock photo pricing and its downward slide. If you have time over the holidays you may want to review some of these stories as you plan your strategy ...
Read More
Future Of Stock Photography
If you’re a photographer that counts on the licensing of stock images to provide a portion of your annual income the following are a few stories you should read. In the past decade stock photography ...
Read More
Blockchain Stories
The opening session at this year’s CEPIC Congress in Berlin on May 30, 2018 is entitled “Can Blockchain be applied to the Photo Industry?” For those who would like to know more about the existing blo...
Read More
2017 Stories Worth Reviewing
The following are links to some 2017 and early 2018 stories that might be worth reviewing as we move into the new year.
Read More
Stories Related To Stock Photo Pricing
The following are links to stories that deal with stock photo pricing trends. Probably the biggest problem the industry has faced in recent years has been the steady decline in prices for the use of ...
Read More
Stock Photo Prices: The Future
This story is FREE. Feel free to pass it along to anyone interested in licensing their work as stock photography. On October 23rd at the DMLA 2017 Conference in New York there will be a panel discuss...
Read More
Important Stock Photo Industry Issues
Here are links to recent stories that deal with three major issues for the stock photo industry – Revenue Growth Potential, Setting Bottom Line On Pricing and Future Production Sources.
Read More
Recent Stories – Summer 2016
If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
Read More
Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
Read More
Finding The Right Image
Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
Read More

More from Free Stuff