Volume Based Photojournalism

Posted on 9/14/2011 by Paul Melcher | Printable Version | Comments (4)

Paul Melcher takes a look at where photojournalism is headed and outlines four key changes that will dramatically alter the future of photojournalism. He also acknowledges, though not with any sense of satisfaction, that the new photojournalism is taking some cues from the successful microstock model.


Get the Full Article (1 Credit)

Have an Account?

Access to this site is an exclusive benefit for you. Enter your username and password in the form above. If you don't remember your password you can reset it at any time.


Forgot your password?

New to Selling Stock?

Selling Stock is a subscription based on-line newsletter that reports on developing trends in the stock photo industry. It is updated at least twice a month. On-line subscribers receive e-mail notification whenever new stories are posted. Archives containing stories going back to late 1995 are fully available to subscribers.


Copyright © 2011 Paul Melcher. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-251-0720, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

Comments

  • John Harris Posted Sep 15, 2011
    Forgive me but like much of what is said here, there is a self fulfilling prophecy to this, in that the more photographers are persuaded there is very little value to what they do, the less likely they are to stand up for sustainable prices. I don't think it is true that newspapers do not have the funds (anyway those that don't invest in content are on the way out) but they have been offered pictures at such a low rate by the "big boys" that peanuts is all they want to pay. Certainly, as a result of their acquisitions/mergers there are many newspapers - particularly in America, that are (like Getty) leveraged with high debt levels - I don't see why we should pay for their poor business plan. Nor is it at all clear that the “volume-based agency model" is actually profitable in any quarter! In the UK we watch the fate of Rex features, for example, with interest. Look at the coverage of the riots in the UK, dominated by one or two pictures from Getty but others got a look in, even with all the cameras around. Indeed some agencies, under resourced by "the model", found themselves casting wildly around, caught out.

    If as you say, "the volume model" is to be devastating for photographers, what will happen to the “difficult to do" picture–that which requires skill, time and commitment? They will just happen across it? Monkeys and typewriters? Seems a little unrealistic to me. Many editors are sick of wading through an ocean of mediocrity and the meaningless, vaguely and tediously surreal rubbish. What about trust...relationship? Furthermore, there may be a greater interest in photojournalism in the months & years ahead.–which, after all, thrives when narratives are contested.


  • Paul Melcher Posted Sep 15, 2011
    "what will happen to the “difficult to do" picture–that which requires skill, time and commitment?"
    They will continued to be created and displayed. Albeit only shown and seen in Photojournalism festival like Perpignan or Look3 or galleries and museums. If volume based photojournalism is a self fulfilling prophecy, " those that don't invest in content are on the way out" is wishful thinking. The recent successes of sites like Huffington Post is proof of the contrary. Even if "Many editors are sick of wading through an ocean of mediocrity and the meaningless, vaguely and tediously surreal rubbish", they are not the ones who make the financial decisions. I am not saying that I support and agree with what is going on, just stating the facts.

  • Mark W. Richards Posted Sep 17, 2011
    So when do get the good news
    I really sick of you telling us to give up
    How about something we can do for a change

  • Tom Zimberoff Posted Sep 17, 2011
    This isn't an article; it's a rant. Nonetheless, if its dreadfully poor grammar were any better than its content, it might have been worth paying for. Apparently, not only photo editors are disappearing. Whining doesn't help. I'd like to see some smart photographers proffering some potential solutions.

Post Comment

You must log in to post comments.

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive our FREE weekly email listing new stories posted.

Follow Us

Free Stuff

Recent Stories – Summer 2016
If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
Read More
Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
Read More
Finding The Right Image
Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
Read More
Where Is The Stock Photo Industry Headed?
For new readers, or those who may have missed some of what I have written over the last few months, the following are a list of stories worth looking at to get a sense of where the industry is headed.
Read More
Photography As A Career
It’s that time of year when high school seniors are waiting for college acceptance letters and thinking about future careers. If you know someone who is thinking about photography as a career you mig...
Read More
2014 Stories You May Have Missed
For many the end of the year is a time to review past experiences and consider whether it makes sense to chart a new course in the year ahead. Stock photography has changed dramatically for professio...
Read More
More Stories In 2014 You May Have Missed
Every so often I put together a list of the most important stories we’ve published in the recent past. If you are engaged in the business of stock photography the links below are to stories that we’v...
Read More
Getty: A Three Month Review
In all the excitement about 35 million FREE images it is worth looking back at some of things that have been happening at Getty Images in the last three months. After watching revenue decline for the...
Read More
State Of Stock Photo Industry: 2013
If you’re looking for an overview of the state of the stock photo industry as of October 2013 the stories listed below are a good place to start. Regular readers of Selling-Stock will have seen all t...
Read More
Education Market Shifts To Digital
If supplying pictures for educational use is a significant part of your business plan you need to be aware of how the market is trending toward digital delivery and how that is likely to affect the p...
Read More

More from Free Stuff