70% of Nothing

Posted on 9/16/2008 by Jim Pickerell | Printable Version | Comments (2)

One thing PhotoShelter's demise teaches us is that 70% of nothing is still nothing. Percentage alone is not the critical issue for photographers. Nevertheless, too many focus on that issue, because it is the only absolute in a relationship where someone else is licensing rights to your photography.

If a photographer is interested in earning part of his living from stock photography, he should be more concerned with average monthly earnings and the costs, in resources and time, needed to earn that money. These numbers are very hard to determine without putting some images into play. As a result, most photographers don’t even try to consider them.

Once the photographer has invested some time and money producing images, he may discover that, regardless of whether he gets 20% or 70% of gross license fees, he could earn more working part-time at McDonald’s. At that point, the stock photographer must decide whether he is producing images because it’s a fun hobby, because he’s trying to build his photographic skills, or because his main business is graphic design and supporting a cheap source of imagery enables him to get cheap images when he needs them for his own designs, thus earning more from his graphic design work. If it’s for any of these reasons, then the money earned is not the issue, and it makes little difference whether the royalty is 70%, 20% or 1%. On the other hand, if the photographer needs more revenue than his stock is generating, he better turn to assignment work or some other career, rather than looking for a distributor that offers a higher percentage.

Given the number of people entering the business at all levels—even microstock—and the growing number of images in all collections, the average return per image in a collection will continue to go down. In addition, given the increased costs for distributors to effectively market their collections, the percentages of gross revenue paid to image producers will probably decline. The only ways for image producers to grow profits will be to cut production costs and make their images available through a greater number of distributors, using a variety of marketing models.

Some producers look at the volume of sales at fees of $2 or $3 and think, “If the distributor would just raise the price or give us a better percentage, I could make it in this business.” The problem is that as the price goes up, the volume goes down. (Despite this, I believe microstock prices could be raised significantly, with little or no loss in volume.)

The difference between 20% and 70% is only significant if volume and price remain the same—and they never will. Thus, insisting on a higher percentage may not be in the photographer’s best interest. At the very least, the photographer who hopes to earn significant revenue from stock production should diversify and experiment with a variety of licensing models and marketing options. Don’t pick a distributor or agent solely on the percentage offered or how “photographer-friendly” they are.

Copyright © 2008 Jim Pickerell. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-251-0720, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

Jim Pickerell is founder of www.selling-stock.com, an online newsletter that publishes daily. He is also available for personal telephone consultations on pricing and other matters related to stock photography. He occasionally acts as an expert witness on matters related to stock photography. For his current curriculum vitae go to: http://www.jimpickerell.com/Curriculum-Vitae.aspx.  


  • Bill Brooks Posted Sep 16, 2008
    To state the obvious, the trick is to find someone that can sell your work AND pay you 70%. With todays prices and volume if you accept 20% and manage to make a living, then you are underpaid and you owe your soul to the company store. To accept 20% may be a short term solution, but is a bad business plan for the long run

  • Tim Mcguire Posted Sep 17, 2008

    I agree with what you're saying but I'd be interested to know if you think it would have made a difference if the revenue split between Photographers and Photoshelter were reversed, Photoshelter getting 70%, Photographers 30%?

Post Comment

You must log in to post comments.

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive our FREE weekly email listing new stories posted.

Follow Us

Free Stuff

Recent Stories – Summer 2016
If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
Read More
Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
Read More
Finding The Right Image
Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
Read More
Where Is The Stock Photo Industry Headed?
For new readers, or those who may have missed some of what I have written over the last few months, the following are a list of stories worth looking at to get a sense of where the industry is headed.
Read More
Photography As A Career
It’s that time of year when high school seniors are waiting for college acceptance letters and thinking about future careers. If you know someone who is thinking about photography as a career you mig...
Read More
2014 Stories You May Have Missed
For many the end of the year is a time to review past experiences and consider whether it makes sense to chart a new course in the year ahead. Stock photography has changed dramatically for professio...
Read More
More Stories In 2014 You May Have Missed
Every so often I put together a list of the most important stories we’ve published in the recent past. If you are engaged in the business of stock photography the links below are to stories that we’v...
Read More
Getty: A Three Month Review
In all the excitement about 35 million FREE images it is worth looking back at some of things that have been happening at Getty Images in the last three months. After watching revenue decline for the...
Read More
State Of Stock Photo Industry: 2013
If you’re looking for an overview of the state of the stock photo industry as of October 2013 the stories listed below are a good place to start. Regular readers of Selling-Stock will have seen all t...
Read More
Education Market Shifts To Digital
If supplying pictures for educational use is a significant part of your business plan you need to be aware of how the market is trending toward digital delivery and how that is likely to affect the p...
Read More

More from Free Stuff