70% of Nothing

Posted on 9/16/2008 by Jim Pickerell | Printable Version | Comments (2)

One thing PhotoShelter's demise teaches us is that 70% of nothing is still nothing. Percentage alone is not the critical issue for photographers. Nevertheless, too many focus on that issue, because it is the only absolute in a relationship where someone else is licensing rights to your photography.

If a photographer is interested in earning part of his living from stock photography, he should be more concerned with average monthly earnings and the costs, in resources and time, needed to earn that money. These numbers are very hard to determine without putting some images into play. As a result, most photographers don’t even try to consider them.

Once the photographer has invested some time and money producing images, he may discover that, regardless of whether he gets 20% or 70% of gross license fees, he could earn more working part-time at McDonald’s. At that point, the stock photographer must decide whether he is producing images because it’s a fun hobby, because he’s trying to build his photographic skills, or because his main business is graphic design and supporting a cheap source of imagery enables him to get cheap images when he needs them for his own designs, thus earning more from his graphic design work. If it’s for any of these reasons, then the money earned is not the issue, and it makes little difference whether the royalty is 70%, 20% or 1%. On the other hand, if the photographer needs more revenue than his stock is generating, he better turn to assignment work or some other career, rather than looking for a distributor that offers a higher percentage.

Given the number of people entering the business at all levels—even microstock—and the growing number of images in all collections, the average return per image in a collection will continue to go down. In addition, given the increased costs for distributors to effectively market their collections, the percentages of gross revenue paid to image producers will probably decline. The only ways for image producers to grow profits will be to cut production costs and make their images available through a greater number of distributors, using a variety of marketing models.

Some producers look at the volume of sales at fees of $2 or $3 and think, “If the distributor would just raise the price or give us a better percentage, I could make it in this business.” The problem is that as the price goes up, the volume goes down. (Despite this, I believe microstock prices could be raised significantly, with little or no loss in volume.)

The difference between 20% and 70% is only significant if volume and price remain the same—and they never will. Thus, insisting on a higher percentage may not be in the photographer’s best interest. At the very least, the photographer who hopes to earn significant revenue from stock production should diversify and experiment with a variety of licensing models and marketing options. Don’t pick a distributor or agent solely on the percentage offered or how “photographer-friendly” they are.

Copyright © 2008 Jim Pickerell. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-461-7627, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

Jim Pickerell is founder of www.selling-stock.com, an online newsletter that publishes daily. He is also available for personal telephone consultations on pricing and other matters related to stock photography. He occasionally acts as an expert witness on matters related to stock photography. For his current curriculum vitae go to: http://www.jimpickerell.com/Curriculum-Vitae.aspx.  


  • Bill Brooks Posted Sep 16, 2008
    To state the obvious, the trick is to find someone that can sell your work AND pay you 70%. With todays prices and volume if you accept 20% and manage to make a living, then you are underpaid and you owe your soul to the company store. To accept 20% may be a short term solution, but is a bad business plan for the long run

  • Tim Mcguire Posted Sep 17, 2008

    I agree with what you're saying but I'd be interested to know if you think it would have made a difference if the revenue split between Photographers and Photoshelter were reversed, Photoshelter getting 70%, Photographers 30%?

Post Comment

Please log in or create an account to post comments.

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive email notification when new stories are posted.

Follow Us

Free Stuff

Stock Photo Pricing: The Future
In the last two years I have written a lot about stock photo pricing and its downward slide. If you have time over the holidays you may want to review some of these stories as you plan your strategy ...
Read More
Future Of Stock Photography
If you’re a photographer that counts on the licensing of stock images to provide a portion of your annual income the following are a few stories you should read. In the past decade stock photography ...
Read More
Blockchain Stories
The opening session at this year’s CEPIC Congress in Berlin on May 30, 2018 is entitled “Can Blockchain be applied to the Photo Industry?” For those who would like to know more about the existing blo...
Read More
2017 Stories Worth Reviewing
The following are links to some 2017 and early 2018 stories that might be worth reviewing as we move into the new year.
Read More
Stories Related To Stock Photo Pricing
The following are links to stories that deal with stock photo pricing trends. Probably the biggest problem the industry has faced in recent years has been the steady decline in prices for the use of ...
Read More
Stock Photo Prices: The Future
This story is FREE. Feel free to pass it along to anyone interested in licensing their work as stock photography. On October 23rd at the DMLA 2017 Conference in New York there will be a panel discuss...
Read More
Important Stock Photo Industry Issues
Here are links to recent stories that deal with three major issues for the stock photo industry – Revenue Growth Potential, Setting Bottom Line On Pricing and Future Production Sources.
Read More
Recent Stories – Summer 2016
If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
Read More
Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
Read More
Finding The Right Image
Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
Read More

More from Free Stuff