Agency Liability For Lost Images Limited

Posted on 1/22/2003 by Jim Pickerell | Printable Version | Comments (0)



January 22, 2003

    Editors note: Given a new New York court decision photographers may have little
    recourse if a stock agency loses some of their images. This is good news for agencies and

    maybe bad news for photographers. It has always been difficult for photographers to obtain
    compensation when their agent is responsible for losing their images (as opposed to a loss
    by a customer), but as a result of Adamo v. Corbis it is likely to be even more difficult.
    In the following article originally published in the PACA newsletter Nancy E. Wolff, counsel for
    PACA, outlines the case and the issues.

By: Nancy E. Wolff

New York State Court upholds language in stock industry contract that includes
limitation of liability clause.

Adamo v. Corbis Corp. as successor in interest to The Stock Market Photo Agency of New
York, Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, Index No. 602063/02,
Decision dated 12/02/02, Filed 12/20/02, Justice Richard B. Lowe III

Photographer, Jeff Adamo had a long-term relationship with the photo library The Stock
Market (TSM). He had entered into a serious of successive three-year contracts with TSM.
In 2000, the contract was not renewed. Subsequent to TSM's decision not to renew the
photographer's agreement, Corbis purchased TSM and was responsible for completing the
retrieval of the photographer's outstanding photographs.

According to the contract, TSM was to use reasonable efforts to return Adamo's
photographs. It was agreed that after termination, TSM would have 12 months to return
images within the TSM files in New York, 18 months to retrieve photographs located in
foreign offices and 2 years to return photographs in the possession of clients.

Many returns were made to the photographer during this period using return forms to track
the number of returned photographs. However, after the retrieval period ended, the
photographer brought a breach of contract claim against TSM alleging that TSM violated the
terms of the agreement by failing to return 135 of the approximately 2000 photographic
transparencies submitted, and sought $205,500 in damages or $1500 per transparency.

The contract with TSM contained a limitation of liability clause using language similar to
the model PACA form contributorœs agreement that has been recommended over the years.

    TSM shall provide a suitable environment for long-term storage, care, and retrieval
    of your images and shall strive to protect and care for your images that are on file with
    TSM. However, if there is any damage, theft, or loss of your images, TSM shall not be
    liable unless such damage, theft, or loss was a result of TSM's willful or gross
    negligence. You agree that in no event shall TSMœs liability exceed one hundred ($100.00)

Relying on the language in the contract, I brought a motion on behalf of Corbis
Corporation to dismiss the claim. The court considered the language in the contract as
well as an affidavit of a Corbis employee, stating the steps Corbis undertook to secure
the return of the photographer's work that had been distributed worldwide. The court found
that the steps Corbis took to retrieve the photographs reasonable and successful a
majority of the time. These efforts included searching domestic libraries, searching
international libraries and notifying all worldwide offices of the photographer's
"inactive status" requiring outstanding photographs to be returned. The photographer
offered no statement to controvert Corbis' assertion that these steps were reasonable or
to establish that these efforts were less than the reasonable standard in the photo stock
library industry. The court concluded that it was reasonable to assume that any photograph
that had not been returned after these efforts was "lost". It was apparent to the court
that it considered the return to the photographer to be significant as it emphasized that
only 135 of approximately 2000 had not been returned.

In examining the limited liability language the court stated "This limited liability
clause is accepted throughout the stock photograph industry as standard practice, simply
because over the course of time and shipment all over the globe, the possibility of loss,
theft or damage exists to a large extent."

The court found that the agreement between Corbis (via TSM) and Adamo limited Corbis'
liability to $100 only if Corbis or the TSM was grossly or willfully negligent. Simply
negligence results in no liability. However, the complaint did not allege that TSM or
Corbis was negligent, only that photographs were not returned through reasonable efforts.
Based on evidence of Corbis' efforts to return the photographs, the court held that the
agreement was not breached. Consequently, the court granted the motion to dismiss the
claim with prejudice.

Photo libraries have relied on similar limited liability language over the years in the
event they are unable to retrieve one hundred percent of a contributor's work after the
end of a relationship. However, no court has had the opportunity to review the language
and consider its validity. Since insurance for the full value of transparencies is not
available at any reasonable price, the exposure a library would face in the event of a
claim could be significant if this limited liability language was not found to be valid.
Of course, the photo library must take reasonable steps to return contributors' property,
but as the court noted, the likelihood that some material may be lost or damaged over time
is inevitable.

Finally, this case reinforces the importance of written contracts with all contributors
that contain standard language to protect the photo library from unnecessary risk. Without
a contract that provides for the limited liability in the event of a loss, the photo
library remains vulnerable to claims if property cannot be returned to a contributor at
the end of a relationship.

The decision can be found online at V.PDF

Copyright © 2003 Jim Pickerell. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-461-7627, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

Jim Pickerell is founder of, an online newsletter that publishes daily. He is also available for personal telephone consultations on pricing and other matters related to stock photography. He occasionally acts as an expert witness on matters related to stock photography. For his current curriculum vitae go to:  


Be the first to comment below.

Post Comment

Please log in or create an account to post comments.

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive email notification when new stories are posted.

Follow Us

Free Stuff

Stock Photo Pricing: The Future
In the last two years I have written a lot about stock photo pricing and its downward slide. If you have time over the holidays you may want to review some of these stories as you plan your strategy ...
Read More
Future Of Stock Photography
If you’re a photographer that counts on the licensing of stock images to provide a portion of your annual income the following are a few stories you should read. In the past decade stock photography ...
Read More
Blockchain Stories
The opening session at this year’s CEPIC Congress in Berlin on May 30, 2018 is entitled “Can Blockchain be applied to the Photo Industry?” For those who would like to know more about the existing blo...
Read More
2017 Stories Worth Reviewing
The following are links to some 2017 and early 2018 stories that might be worth reviewing as we move into the new year.
Read More
Stories Related To Stock Photo Pricing
The following are links to stories that deal with stock photo pricing trends. Probably the biggest problem the industry has faced in recent years has been the steady decline in prices for the use of ...
Read More
Stock Photo Prices: The Future
This story is FREE. Feel free to pass it along to anyone interested in licensing their work as stock photography. On October 23rd at the DMLA 2017 Conference in New York there will be a panel discuss...
Read More
Important Stock Photo Industry Issues
Here are links to recent stories that deal with three major issues for the stock photo industry – Revenue Growth Potential, Setting Bottom Line On Pricing and Future Production Sources.
Read More
Recent Stories – Summer 2016
If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
Read More
Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
Read More
Finding The Right Image
Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
Read More

More from Free Stuff