Alamy iStock Comparisons

Posted on 1/22/2008 by Jim Pickerell | Printable Version | Comments (1)

Some photographers on the iStock (IS) forum are having great fun pointing out that they make more on iStock than the average Alamy photographer. They focus on the statement I made that "the average gross RPI for all images on the (Alamy) site is about $2.80." Since Alamy photographers get at least a 65% royalty, that comes out to a photographer royalty of about $1.80 per image annually.

Not much, but let's take a closer look at the numbers.

iStock has 2,603,000 images on its site. Alamy has four times as many at 10,790,000. The $2.80 number is based on agross revenue of about $30 million. Getty won't release the gross revenue of iStock in 2007, but there is good reason to believe it is around $2.25 per download, with the total number of downloads for 2007 being around 16 million. That works out to gross revenue of about $36 million.

Divide 2,603,000 into $36 million, and you get an average RPI of $13.83. Since most non-exclusive photographers get a 20% royalty that's $2.77 to the photographer. In some cases, they get as high as 40% or $5.44. Just like Alamy, a few make a lot and the vast majority make a lot less. Alamy contributors need to note these differences and recognize that a lot of contributors selling into the traditional market aren't making as much as at least some photographers selling microstock.

However, as Paul Cowan points out to his fellow contributors on the iStock forum, itt is "much more complicated than (many) suggest."

If iStock had 10 million images on its site, the average gross RPI would be about $3.34 and at 20%, the photographer would be getting and RPI of $0.67. Or looked at another way, if Alamy had tightly edited its collection down to 2,603,000 images, the average RPI would be about $11.50, and the photographer's share would be $7.49 per image.
iStock has a much more tightly edited file than Alamy, which makes its higher RPI possible. Adding more images doesn't mean sales will increase at the same rate, but the odds of the customer finding something they like may be better, at least that is Alamy's strategy. In addition, it is a lot easier to get an image accepted on Alamy than iStock.

Most iStock photographers know that some images that have been rejected by iStock turn out to be good sellers elsewhere. When thinking about average RPI, the photographer needs to give some consideration to the cost and energy expended producing images that are eventually rejected, not just the images actually accepted by the agency.

Let's also take a look at what the top earners make. At Alamy, the top photographer earned about $163,000 and the 100th on the list earned $15,600. Lise Gagne probably earned more than $163,000, but she is also exclusive with iStock. How many at iStock earn more than $15,600 annually? What about the next 100? Alamy has 15,127 photographers. iStock has about 47,000, according to last count. A huge percentage of photographers at both agencies aren't earning very much. If 100 iStock photographers make less than $15,600 annually, that's a much smaller percentage of total contributors than 100 from Alamy.

It should also be remembered that Alamy is only one source of revenue for its photographers. All Alamy photographers are non-exclusive. Most have their images with many other agencies. A photographer's gross annual revenue is the sum total from all sources.

On the iStock forum Paul Cowan said, "I don't think it is any disgrace to supply less mainstream market sectors." I agree. But here's what's troubling: when an image is sold for $20 or less for use in a magazine, a major brochure with a circulation of 500,000, or for a billboard. Why should these commercial users get such valuable use for so little money? At Alamy these customers would pay a lot more. The average RF license at Alamy in Q3 2007 was about $235, and the average commercial license was $393.

Have any iStock photographers ever received this kind of money, or more for a single download? Images used for commercial purposes supply significant value to users, and such users are willing to pay significantly more than iStock prices when they use an image in this manner. Just because an image is produced by an amateur doesn't mean it has less value for the customer. Wouldn't it be great if you could sell to non-mainstream market sectors at iStock prices and commercial sectors at Alamy prices?

A final factor to consider is that soon Alamy will be launching its Novel Use Scheme (NUS) that will be selling images into some of the same markets as iStock at similar prices, although probably not as low. Details have yet to be announced. Alamy contributors have already committed over 3 million images to the NUS project. When NUS is launched, Alamy should begin to get a share of the microstock market. Will that hurt microstock sellers?

If Alamy can afford to pay contributors 65% of gross, why can't iStock?

Copyright © 2008 Jim Pickerell. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-461-7627, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

Jim Pickerell is founder of, an online newsletter that publishes daily. He is also available for personal telephone consultations on pricing and other matters related to stock photography. He occasionally acts as an expert witness on matters related to stock photography. For his current curriculum vitae go to:  


  • Stephen Frink Posted Jan 23, 2008
    Jim - All good points. I wonder how many iStock contributors will take the time to read and ponder them though? Or for that matter, how many are committed enough to the stock photo industry to subscribe to a news service like yours. Too bad all 47,000 of them don't.

Post Comment

Please log in or create an account to post comments.

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive email notification when new stories are posted.

Follow Us

Free Stuff

Stock Photo Pricing: The Future
In the last two years I have written a lot about stock photo pricing and its downward slide. If you have time over the holidays you may want to review some of these stories as you plan your strategy ...
Read More
Future Of Stock Photography
If you’re a photographer that counts on the licensing of stock images to provide a portion of your annual income the following are a few stories you should read. In the past decade stock photography ...
Read More
Blockchain Stories
The opening session at this year’s CEPIC Congress in Berlin on May 30, 2018 is entitled “Can Blockchain be applied to the Photo Industry?” For those who would like to know more about the existing blo...
Read More
2017 Stories Worth Reviewing
The following are links to some 2017 and early 2018 stories that might be worth reviewing as we move into the new year.
Read More
Stories Related To Stock Photo Pricing
The following are links to stories that deal with stock photo pricing trends. Probably the biggest problem the industry has faced in recent years has been the steady decline in prices for the use of ...
Read More
Stock Photo Prices: The Future
This story is FREE. Feel free to pass it along to anyone interested in licensing their work as stock photography. On October 23rd at the DMLA 2017 Conference in New York there will be a panel discuss...
Read More
Important Stock Photo Industry Issues
Here are links to recent stories that deal with three major issues for the stock photo industry – Revenue Growth Potential, Setting Bottom Line On Pricing and Future Production Sources.
Read More
Recent Stories – Summer 2016
If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
Read More
Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
Read More
Finding The Right Image
Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
Read More

More from Free Stuff