Alternative Strategy For Subscription

Posted on 10/24/2005 by Jim Pickerell | Printable Version | Comments (0)

68

ALTERNATIVE STRATEGY FOR SUBSCRIPTION


October 24, 2005

A21 has acquired Ingram, a UK-based provider with a file of approximately 100,000 images that are offered for licensing by subscription, as CD-ROM or as single-image RF.

For the company's outstanding stock the shareholders received $965,039 in cash, $1,448,000 in the form of preferred stock of a21 which is convertible into shares of a21 common stock at a minimum price of $0.50 per share, and 3,620,000 shares of a21 common stock. Final adjustments will be made to the purchase price after finalization of Ingram's closing balance sheet. In addition, a21 repaid a $1,548,071 credit facility of Ingram and other Ingram debt and transactions costs of $286,890. Ingram had no other material liabilities at closing other than ordinary course accounts payable and accrued expenses. The amount of consideration was determined by an arms length negotiation.

Most subscription sellers believe that every image they offer at the low subscription rates must be wholly owned so they don't have to pay out any portion of the fees charged. However, in Ingram's case only a very small percentage of the images in their subscription offering are wholly owned and they must pay a royalty share of each license.

Traditionally, photographers have received a percentage of the fee charged for using an image, but with subscription products it is impossible to determine which images are actually used. To get around this problem Ingram has based its method for calculating royalties on single-image downloads, or the total number of images on a CD, rather than images used.

Essentially, the contributor receives his agreed percentage of the overall paid revenue according to the proportion of his images downloaded in each quarter. So for example if the overall revenue to Ingram in the first quarter is $1,000,000, and there are 100,000 downloads of which 5,000 (5% of the total) belonged to a given contributor, then assuming a royalty of 20% the contributor's payment would be $10,000.

Ingram photographers can go on the site at any time and see what is in their account, however because their figure is always based on their percentage of the total images downloaded the number could fluctuate up or down throughout the quarter. (If early in the quarter a high percentage of one photographer's images were downloaded by one or a few clients the photographer's total revenue might be higher until the purchases made by other customers during the quarter began to kick in and affect the averages up until the date of actual payout. The photographer is always concerned about the proportion of his images that are downloaded relative to those of all other photographers.)

Things To Consider

It might also be possible for a photographer to game this system by buying a subscription and then downloading the total number of his images allowed (and no images from any of the other photographers). However, it is unclear whether such gaming would really present much of a financial benefit and it would probably be easy for Ingram to spot.

Obviously, the way to make money in this system is to have a significant portion of the total images in the file. What is unclear is how many images a photographer would probably need to have in file in order to generate 5% or so of the downloads in a quarter. In any given quarter every photographer earns exactly the same per download regardless of the production values built into the image. Possibly, images with greater production values might be downloaded more frequently, but it would seem that most photographers would want to focus on keeping their cost per image low and getting a volume accepted.

Because this calculation is based on the total images licensed by all customers and not on the specific images used by each licensee there is another possible point of inequity. For example one group of customers (Group A) may pays $800 for a license and each download 8 images per quarter from one, or very few, photographers. Another group of licensees (Group B) might download an average of 300 images per $800 license fee in the quarter, and none of those images belong to the photographers in Group A. Because the two groups are lumped together for the purpose of determining the average royalty to be paid out, the photographers in Group A will receive significantly less than if the royalty were calculated on the specific images used by each licensee.

One of the benefits of the pay-for-download strategy for distributors is that they can earn significant revenue without the huge cost in ownership of the images. Consequently, if the business model is accepted by enough photographers some of those distributors who are now going to extraordinary extents to own images may decide that it is better to pay royalties, particularly once they own a quantity of the high demand subject matter.


Copyright © 2005 Jim Pickerell. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-251-0720, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

Jim Pickerell is founder of www.selling-stock.com, an online newsletter that publishes daily. He is also available for personal telephone consultations on pricing and other matters related to stock photography. He occasionally acts as an expert witness on matters related to stock photography. For his current curriculum vitae go to: http://www.jimpickerell.com/Curriculum-Vitae.aspx.  

Comments

Be the first to comment below.

Post Comment

You must log in to post comments.

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive our FREE weekly email listing new stories posted.

Follow Us

Free Stuff

Recent Stories – Summer 2016
If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
Read More
Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
Read More
Finding The Right Image
Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
Read More
Where Is The Stock Photo Industry Headed?
For new readers, or those who may have missed some of what I have written over the last few months, the following are a list of stories worth looking at to get a sense of where the industry is headed.
Read More
Photography As A Career
It’s that time of year when high school seniors are waiting for college acceptance letters and thinking about future careers. If you know someone who is thinking about photography as a career you mig...
Read More
2014 Stories You May Have Missed
For many the end of the year is a time to review past experiences and consider whether it makes sense to chart a new course in the year ahead. Stock photography has changed dramatically for professio...
Read More
More Stories In 2014 You May Have Missed
Every so often I put together a list of the most important stories we’ve published in the recent past. If you are engaged in the business of stock photography the links below are to stories that we’v...
Read More
Getty: A Three Month Review
In all the excitement about 35 million FREE images it is worth looking back at some of things that have been happening at Getty Images in the last three months. After watching revenue decline for the...
Read More
State Of Stock Photo Industry: 2013
If you’re looking for an overview of the state of the stock photo industry as of October 2013 the stories listed below are a good place to start. Regular readers of Selling-Stock will have seen all t...
Read More
Education Market Shifts To Digital
If supplying pictures for educational use is a significant part of your business plan you need to be aware of how the market is trending toward digital delivery and how that is likely to affect the p...
Read More

More from Free Stuff