ASMP and Time, Inc.

Posted on 6/5/1999 by Jim Pickerell | Printable Version | Comments (0)

227

ASMP AND TIME INC.


June 5, 1999

ASMP is pressing TIME Inc. to raise their minimum editorial day rate from

$400 to $550 immediately. They also want subsequent raises to $600 in 2000

and $650 in 2001. These rates would be for one-time use in print media and

not include electronic rights, foreign language rights, English language

rights outside of North America, or any reprint rights.

Regardless of TIME's position, ASMP also believes that photographers have

good reason to adopt these recommended rates in their individual

negotiations with other publishers. They also point out that while

photographers are free to ignore ASMP's opinion and recommendations, to do

so would only further threaten their economic futures.

Richard Weisgrau, ASMP executive director, has produced a white paper on

Editorial Day Rates and is making it available to both

members and non-members at

www.asmp.org/publications/pubs/dayrate.html .

He recommends that all editorial

photographers forward copies of this report to the editors with whom they

work.

While these figures would be a substantial increase over TIME's current $400

day rate ($500 if electronic rights are included) many photographers feel

ASMP is asking far too little, and has pulled numbers out of the air without

consultation with editorial photographers.

Roger Ressmeyer has pointed out that when he produced ASMP's editorial

photography white paper in 1988 (over ten years ago) some of the top

shooters said the day rate needed to be $1000 a day at that time.

The ASMP report itself points out that in 1973 the day rate was $200 and if

that were adjusted for inflation based on the consumer price index the 1998

rate would have been $734. While the magaines rate has doubled in the past

25 years that certainly has not kept pace with the cost of living. Even the

minimum wage has increased 3.2 times from $1.60 per hour to $5.15 per hour the

last 25 years years photographer's day rates have only doubled.

In the past 45 days a forum for editorial photographers has been established

on the web and it now has over 400 registered users. Informal sharing on

this site has revealed that many other publications are currently paying

much better rates that Time Inc.

The general conclusion after reading comments from working editorial

photographers is that it is extremely important to negotiate each editorial

assignment based on its merits and that there is no "standard" editorial day

rate, although the rates at Time Inc. seem to be lower than most.

(See Story 225) .

The editorial photographers group has recommendd that Time shooters write to

Caren Clarke to explain their need for higher rates. Based on his discussions

with Time, Mr. Weisgrau recommends the opposite.

He says, "In the interim, between now and more developments, I would advise

photographers to back off on the letter writing to Caren Clarke. She knows

that photographers and ASMP cannot accept what Time has offered, and she is

part of the team working on change. What photographers MUST do, if they

want to get that raise they deserve is to send a copy of the ASMP Day Rate

paper to every editor they work with, not just people at Time, Inc.

magazines. The ASMP paper has to reach the masses of editors. It should be

accompanied with a note telling them that a raise is in order, and that the

paper explains why. Unless, the photographer doesn't want a raise, in which

case do nothing. Pressure has to be put on the executives at the top from

the lower levels. Upper management has to hear from middle management that

photographers are getting restless and NEED more money. We have to

influence the budget makers from bottom to top."

Weisgrau concluded, "Keep in mind that Time, Inc. is discussing this matter in good faith. This

has been the history of dealings between ASMP and Time. Let's give Time

some time."


Copyright © 1999 Jim Pickerell. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-251-0720, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

Jim Pickerell is founder of www.selling-stock.com, an online newsletter that publishes daily. He is also available for personal telephone consultations on pricing and other matters related to stock photography. He occasionally acts as an expert witness on matters related to stock photography. For his current curriculum vitae go to: http://www.jimpickerell.com/Curriculum-Vitae.aspx.  

Comments

Be the first to comment below.

Post Comment

You must log in to post comments.

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive our FREE weekly email listing new stories posted.

Follow Us

Free Stuff

Recent Stories – Summer 2016
If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
Read More
Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
Read More
Finding The Right Image
Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
Read More
Where Is The Stock Photo Industry Headed?
For new readers, or those who may have missed some of what I have written over the last few months, the following are a list of stories worth looking at to get a sense of where the industry is headed.
Read More
Photography As A Career
It’s that time of year when high school seniors are waiting for college acceptance letters and thinking about future careers. If you know someone who is thinking about photography as a career you mig...
Read More
2014 Stories You May Have Missed
For many the end of the year is a time to review past experiences and consider whether it makes sense to chart a new course in the year ahead. Stock photography has changed dramatically for professio...
Read More
More Stories In 2014 You May Have Missed
Every so often I put together a list of the most important stories we’ve published in the recent past. If you are engaged in the business of stock photography the links below are to stories that we’v...
Read More
Getty: A Three Month Review
In all the excitement about 35 million FREE images it is worth looking back at some of things that have been happening at Getty Images in the last three months. After watching revenue decline for the...
Read More
State Of Stock Photo Industry: 2013
If you’re looking for an overview of the state of the stock photo industry as of October 2013 the stories listed below are a good place to start. Regular readers of Selling-Stock will have seen all t...
Read More
Education Market Shifts To Digital
If supplying pictures for educational use is a significant part of your business plan you need to be aware of how the market is trending toward digital delivery and how that is likely to affect the p...
Read More

More from Free Stuff