Contest - Win $100.00

Posted on 5/23/2011 by Jim Pickerell | Printable Version | Comments (1)

At the annual CEPIC Congress, this year in Istanbul, where stock photo agents and distributors from around the world meet, I asked attendees the following and agreed to enter the names of those who answer into a drawing for a chance to WIN $100.00.
    Describe a situation where a fee of $10.00, or less, is justified for the COMMERCIAL use of a single image?
I acknowledged that $10.00 or less might be reasonable for uses by individual students for school reports, or for personal purposes like an individual’s blog. After all songs downloaded by individuals are available for $0.99 through iTunes. With the right restrictions low fees for certain personal use of images might be more than justified. And in some cases the volume of such uses could be substantial. In my view such personal uses are “commercial” if they generate any revenue at all. Are you willing to license your images for such uses?

The contest deadline is June 12, 2011. I’m inviting Selling-Stock subscribers to also participate in this contest. All you need to do to become eligible to win the $100.00 is email your answer to the question, along with contact information, to There will be a random drawing and every respondent has an equal chance to win regardless of their answer.

If under no conditions will you ever license rights to your images for $10.00, I also want to hear from you. Tell me your bottom line price and describe the use you will allow for that figure. I’m looking for serious answers, but humorous ones are also acceptable. One of the early respondents said he would only charge $10.00 to use one of his photos on a tombstone, pointing out that in many cemeteries relatives of the deceased place photos of their love ones on tombstones. He is even willing to grant unlimited future rights for this use.

However, one thing to be considered if you’re going to sell for low prices is that there should be a reasonable chance to make a volume of sales of the same image for the low price. I doubt if that will be the case for pictures on tombstones!

Another respondents argued that the word “justified” put an unfair qualification on the question. He argued that “any fee agreed upon between a willing buyer and a willing seller is reasonable and therefore justified.” He went on to point out that no seller would agree to sell below his costs, except in a “loss leader” transaction designed to generate other business.

While in pure economic theory the above is true, it does not hold up in the stock photo business given the relationship between distributor and producer. The distributor, not the producer, sets the price. Usually the distributor has no understanding whatsoever of the producer’s cost. The distributor can sell at a price where his share covers his costs. But the producer’s share may not be enough to begin to cover his costs. The only alternative for the producer in this case is to cut costs to the bone, or go out of business. Meanwhile the distributor may go on selling the products of other producers below their cost of production and recruit new, unknowing producers to replace those who drop out.

I want photographers to begin to share ideas on this issue. Are there some segments of the business where the potential volume justifies making certain images available at low prices? It certainly appears that business to large business sales are diminishing. The market that is growing is business to small business and business to consumers. Of course, there has always been a business to consumer market in portraits and wedding, but for this type of subject matter there is a very limited number of potential customers for any particular set of pictures. Therefore, prices for these pictures need have always needed to remain high in order to cover costs.

However, there are new, developing markets where a high volume of consumers are interested in the same, or very similar images. Individual Customers cannot justify paying high prices for the small, personal uses they intend to make of the images. But the volume of potential sales may be a business worth considering. The question for photographers is whether they are willing to make some of their images available to this market for minimal fees and pursue a volume sales strategy.

I look forward to getting a variety of ideas.

Copyright © 2011 Jim Pickerell. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-251-0720, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

Jim Pickerell is founder of, an online newsletter that publishes daily. He is also available for personal telephone consultations on pricing and other matters related to stock photography. He occasionally acts as an expert witness on matters related to stock photography. For his current curriculum vitae go to:  


  • Jon Feingersh Posted May 23, 2011
    The only time an image is worth a usage price of $10 is when the distributor has his head well inserted in his derriere. It is at that particular time that the distributor is deaf, dumb, blind, and insulated from the real world, so that he doesn't see how he is ruining his own business, as well as others, by charging so little for a more valuable commodity.

    Jon F

Post Comment

You must log in to post comments.

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive our FREE weekly email listing new stories posted.

Follow Us

Free Stuff

Recent Stories – Summer 2016
If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
Read More
Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
Read More
Finding The Right Image
Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
Read More
Where Is The Stock Photo Industry Headed?
For new readers, or those who may have missed some of what I have written over the last few months, the following are a list of stories worth looking at to get a sense of where the industry is headed.
Read More
Photography As A Career
It’s that time of year when high school seniors are waiting for college acceptance letters and thinking about future careers. If you know someone who is thinking about photography as a career you mig...
Read More
2014 Stories You May Have Missed
For many the end of the year is a time to review past experiences and consider whether it makes sense to chart a new course in the year ahead. Stock photography has changed dramatically for professio...
Read More
More Stories In 2014 You May Have Missed
Every so often I put together a list of the most important stories we’ve published in the recent past. If you are engaged in the business of stock photography the links below are to stories that we’v...
Read More
Getty: A Three Month Review
In all the excitement about 35 million FREE images it is worth looking back at some of things that have been happening at Getty Images in the last three months. After watching revenue decline for the...
Read More
State Of Stock Photo Industry: 2013
If you’re looking for an overview of the state of the stock photo industry as of October 2013 the stories listed below are a good place to start. Regular readers of Selling-Stock will have seen all t...
Read More
Education Market Shifts To Digital
If supplying pictures for educational use is a significant part of your business plan you need to be aware of how the market is trending toward digital delivery and how that is likely to affect the p...
Read More

More from Free Stuff