Copyright Small Claims Court

Posted on 4/3/2006 by Jim Pickerell | Printable Version | Comments (0)

818

COPYRIGHT SMALL CLAIMS COURT PROPOSED


April 3, 2006

In testimony before the Subcommittee on Courts of the Judiciary Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives, Victor S. Perlman, ASMP General Counsel and Managing Director proposed the establishment of a Copyright Small Claims Court. The court would create an inexpensive legal procedure for collecting small copyright claims involving a few thousand dollars or less in an expeditious manner.

Perlman said that freelance photographers create the largest numbers of copyrighted works of any class of creators, yet as a group they are least able to access the protections theoretically afforded by the Copyright Act due to the extremely high cost of federal court litigation for typically low amounts in controversy.

He also pointed out that, "the availability of statutory damages and attorney's fees is often an illusory benefit" because copyright lawyers are usually unwilling to accept infringement cases when the amount of unauthorized use is small. And he noted that, "If legislation currently being considered for so-called 'orphan works' is enacted in a form that will limit the photographer's damages, the situation will only be exacerbated."

Perlman told the committee that pursuing a copyright claim in federal court can be a serious disruption to a photographer's business and an emotional drain as he is constantly asked for more documentation related to the particular infringement and his business in general. In speaking to a committee made up mostly of lawyers he said, "Attorneys are in the business of dealing with litigation, and we are used to living with it --- it is our job, no more, no less. We often lose sight of the soft costs of litigation. However, to individual creators who are parties to litigation, the experience is intensely personal and emotional, and it stays at the front of their minds every minute from the beginning of the case to the end, and even long after. In addition, the time spent working on the case is time that cannot be spent on making or marketing photographs.

"As an example of the last point, you may recall the landmark case of Rock and Roll Hall of Fame v. Chuck Gentile. The case involved trademark and related claims asserted by the Rock and Roll Hall of fame based on the photographer's poster showing a photo of the Hall of Fame building. The photographer won in the 6th Circuit. Between the photographer's insurance and help from some fundraising by ASMP, the photographer did not have to pay any costs of defense, himself. Despite that, when the case was over, the time and emotional demands of the litigation had destroyed his marriage, ruined his business, and forced him out of the photography profession entirely. The costs of federal litigation for an independent contractor are not limited to money --- years of investing time and energy in a single case are crippling to people whose sole source of income is their ability to create and market their work."

Perlman also acknowledged that there are many possible ways and variations as to how a system could be structured for collecting claims involving a few thousand dollars or less, and said that "ASMP would support virtually any arrangement that would accomplish the desired goal." Then he went on to outline his proposal.

    "As a starting point for your consideration, we offer the following. In our view, to make the system truly efficient and affordable, it should be structured to require the parties to proceed pro se; lawyers should not be permitted to represent either side. Once attorneys enter the picture, the potential complexities and resultant costs escalate. This would essentially be "People's Court" for smaller copyright claims.

    "The system should also permit only limited pre-trial discovery, if any. All relevant documents should be submitted by the parties to the court and each other before the hearing date. Discovery makes litigation more extended, complex and expensive.

    "There should be a (comparatively) short time frame from complaint to answer to hearing to disposition.

    "Hearings would be tightly controlled and of short duration. Where the parties are in distant locations from each other, hearings might even be conducted over video-conferencing systems rather than in person.

    "Appeals should require the appellant to post a bond sufficient to cover the appellee's estimated attorney's fees for the appeal, in the event that the appellant lost the appeal.

    "Our wish list would cap jurisdiction at $10,000., which is the limit for many large-city small claims courts.

    "Our preference would also be that the judge be (or become) a copyright specialist by virtue of his or her assignment to a copyright-specific small claims court or to an administrative law judge position affiliated in some fashion with the Copyright Office, perhaps along the lines of the Copyright Royalty Judge system. One of the big problems facing small copyright owners is the fact that many Judges do not have much familiarity with copyright, and they are particularly unfamiliar with the customs and practices of pricing usage of commercial photographs and other commercial works of art. Presumably, having an adjudicator who deals with these areas of the law repeatedly would help to eliminate that problem."

He concluded by saying, "virtually everyone in the copyright world has long recognized that photographers are uniquely disenfranchised from access to the copyright protections to which they are legally entitled. Anything that this Committee can do to help correct that situation would be of great benefit to photographers and greatly appreciated by them.

"Perhaps more importantly, this is one of those all too rare situations where Congress can really do "the right thing," help the little guy, and make our legal system move a bit closer to a system of justice, not just of laws."


Copyright © 2006 Jim Pickerell. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-251-0720, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

Jim Pickerell is founder of www.selling-stock.com, an online newsletter that publishes daily. He is also available for personal telephone consultations on pricing and other matters related to stock photography. He occasionally acts as an expert witness on matters related to stock photography. For his current curriculum vitae go to: http://www.jimpickerell.com/Curriculum-Vitae.aspx.  

Comments

Be the first to comment below.

Post Comment

You must log in to post comments.

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive our FREE weekly email listing new stories posted.

Follow Us

Free Stuff

Recent Stories – Summer 2016
If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
Read More
Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
Read More
Finding The Right Image
Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
Read More
Where Is The Stock Photo Industry Headed?
For new readers, or those who may have missed some of what I have written over the last few months, the following are a list of stories worth looking at to get a sense of where the industry is headed.
Read More
Photography As A Career
It’s that time of year when high school seniors are waiting for college acceptance letters and thinking about future careers. If you know someone who is thinking about photography as a career you mig...
Read More
2014 Stories You May Have Missed
For many the end of the year is a time to review past experiences and consider whether it makes sense to chart a new course in the year ahead. Stock photography has changed dramatically for professio...
Read More
More Stories In 2014 You May Have Missed
Every so often I put together a list of the most important stories we’ve published in the recent past. If you are engaged in the business of stock photography the links below are to stories that we’v...
Read More
Getty: A Three Month Review
In all the excitement about 35 million FREE images it is worth looking back at some of things that have been happening at Getty Images in the last three months. After watching revenue decline for the...
Read More
State Of Stock Photo Industry: 2013
If you’re looking for an overview of the state of the stock photo industry as of October 2013 the stories listed below are a good place to start. Regular readers of Selling-Stock will have seen all t...
Read More
Education Market Shifts To Digital
If supplying pictures for educational use is a significant part of your business plan you need to be aware of how the market is trending toward digital delivery and how that is likely to affect the p...
Read More

More from Free Stuff