Crowdsourcing Affects Graphic Designers

Posted on 11/26/2008 by Jim Pickerell | Printable Version | Comments (2)

The microstock business was originally created by graphic designers, who thought photography was too expensive. They decided they could save money by sharing images with each other. To get more choices, they reached out to talented hobbyists and those who wanted to break into the business and told them microstock was a way to build their portfolios and get exposure. As a result, the quality and volume of the offering steadily improved.

This made designers happy. Now, they were able to get the pictures they needed for a fraction of what they previously paid. They could take on lower budget projects. They could deliver the finished product for less and still make just as much—or more—for the design portion of their work. Sometimes, they would charge their old customers the same they had always charged, or give them a slight discount, and put more money in their pockets.

Professional photographers screamed that these low-priced offerings were stealing some of their customers. Designers did not care. Initially, designers argued that this product reached a different market that could not afford traditional photography, a market professionals had never addressed. It soon became clear that increasing numbers of the high-paying customers—those who could afford to pay more—were also using microstock. Next, designers took the position that if professional photographers could not compete, they should get out of the business.

Guess what?

Now, the same type of crowdsourcing that has hurt photographers is hurting professional graphic designers. Like photographers, designers are now complaining. They say other competent professional designers, students and those trying to build portfolios, are undercutting them by doing spec work. New sites, for example, 99designs and crowdSPRING, have set up contests where designers compete not with bids, but with final designs. Customers present brief outlines of their needs and a price they are willing to pay. Interested designers compete by offering finished designs.

Derek Powazek, founder of Pixish—which offered the same kind of contests before it folded—argued that the Web site’s users were not the same people who use graphic design shops. (Where have we heard that before?)

When crowdSPRING launched, it asked the crowd to redesign its site for a winning prize of $5,000. There were 418 entries. A student in the Netherlands won. The other 417 designers received nothing for their efforts. One blogger commented: “The only reason this level of inefficiency is tolerated is that the designers are paying for the waste, not the client. How clever! And how depressing.”

Designers may scream, but some continue to work on a contest basis, and that leaves fewer projects for everyone else. Customers love the system, because they get to choose from a large number of completed designs, and only pay the fixed cost for the one they like best.

The American Institute of Graphic Arts believes that doing speculative work seriously compromises the quality of work that clients are entitled to and also violates a tacit long-standing ethical standard in the communication design profession worldwide. AIGA strongly discourages the practice of requesting that design work be produced and submitted on a speculative basis in order to be considered for acceptance on a project.

It is small comfort that the crowdsourcing strategy that initially benefited designers at the expense of many photographers is now hurting designers as well. A critical element in doing spec work as a means of making a living (and this goes for stock photographers as well as designers) is having some way to reasonably assess the odds of being paid for your efforts. For the professional, when it is no longer possible to make such realistic estimations of compensation for effort expended, it is time to move on to another line of work.

Copyright © 2008 Jim Pickerell. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-461-7627, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

Jim Pickerell is founder of, an online newsletter that publishes daily. He is also available for personal telephone consultations on pricing and other matters related to stock photography. He occasionally acts as an expert witness on matters related to stock photography. For his current curriculum vitae go to:  


  • Jon Feingersh Posted Nov 26, 2008
    The word shadenfruede doesn't even come close to the emotions this article will unleash.

  • Fred Voetsch Posted Nov 26, 2008
    As a photographer, you just have to love this story. :-)

    As someone who has been around awhile and seen such dramatic changes in my lifetime the biggest being the DTP revolution itself, which has lead to all of these other changes, I suggest that the ultimate winners will be those who are smart enough and disciplined enough to wait out the earthquake and start rebuilding once the devastation has ceased.

    IMO, the greatest opportunities lie ahead for those who come out of this period with a clean balance sheet and a clear objective.

Post Comment

Please log in or create an account to post comments.

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive email notification when new stories are posted.

Follow Us

Free Stuff

Stock Photo Pricing: The Future
In the last two years I have written a lot about stock photo pricing and its downward slide. If you have time over the holidays you may want to review some of these stories as you plan your strategy ...
Read More
Future Of Stock Photography
If you’re a photographer that counts on the licensing of stock images to provide a portion of your annual income the following are a few stories you should read. In the past decade stock photography ...
Read More
Blockchain Stories
The opening session at this year’s CEPIC Congress in Berlin on May 30, 2018 is entitled “Can Blockchain be applied to the Photo Industry?” For those who would like to know more about the existing blo...
Read More
2017 Stories Worth Reviewing
The following are links to some 2017 and early 2018 stories that might be worth reviewing as we move into the new year.
Read More
Stories Related To Stock Photo Pricing
The following are links to stories that deal with stock photo pricing trends. Probably the biggest problem the industry has faced in recent years has been the steady decline in prices for the use of ...
Read More
Stock Photo Prices: The Future
This story is FREE. Feel free to pass it along to anyone interested in licensing their work as stock photography. On October 23rd at the DMLA 2017 Conference in New York there will be a panel discuss...
Read More
Important Stock Photo Industry Issues
Here are links to recent stories that deal with three major issues for the stock photo industry – Revenue Growth Potential, Setting Bottom Line On Pricing and Future Production Sources.
Read More
Recent Stories – Summer 2016
If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
Read More
Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
Read More
Finding The Right Image
Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
Read More

More from Free Stuff