Does iStockphoto Dominate Microstock?

Posted on 11/5/2007 by Jim Pickerell | Printable Version | Comments (1)

Given the microstock discussion that took place during the recent Getty Images conference call with industry analysts, there may be a misinterpretation of iStockphoto’s strength in the worldwide marketplace.

In a recent Piper Jaffray survey of “professional” image buyers, 54% of respondents said they use iStockphoto sometimes, often, or all the time. In second and third places were Shutterstock with 18%, and Fotolia with 15%. These numbers alone seem to indicate iStockphoto’s clear dominance, but there are other factors to consider.

It should be recognized that this survey was of “professional” buyers who are generally recognized as representing no more than 2% to 3% of all microstock users. The industry has very little understanding of how the other 97% of microstock buyers use the images they download, or what motivates them to use one site over another.



In addition, the survey was also entirely focused on U.S. buyers and did not gather information from the 55% to 60% of buyers in the rest of the world. IStock may dominate the U.S. market, but other brands may have much more traction in other parts of the world, particularly price-sensitive areas. It is important to remember that three of the five major brands were started in Europe and appeal to European buyers and photographers.



A factor that could give iStock more credibility among professional buyers is its connection with Getty Images. Many professional buyers are reluctant to purchase microstock, due to concerns about releases and rights. Given iStock’s connection with Getty Images, customers may believe iStock has tighter control on releases and rights than the other brands, although as best I can determine all the microstock companies are equal in this regard.



From what I can tell, many of the major microstock shooters are European, not American or Canadian. Also, many photographers seem to come from the developing world, where they may find microstock an attractive business model given they don’t need to earn as much as U.S. and Western European photographers to make a living.



Most photographers are not exclusive with one microstock company (as iStock would like them to be). They make more money being with many brands, most of which pay a higher royalty than iStock. From the photographers I have talked to (admittedly a very small sample of the approximately 100,000 microstock photographers), about one-third of their revenue comes from iStock and 2/3rds from all the other brands combined. Thus, I think iStock currently owns something in the range of 33% of the total worldwide market, not 55%.



In addition, iStock currently has a strategy for accepting work that I believe could lead to a decline in their market share. In their efforts to try to grow their number of contributors and upgrade their image quality they only allow photographers to submit 15 new images a month. Not all those are accepted. This may force amateurs to more tightly edit their submissions, but it discourages professionals.



Photographers prepared to work full time as microstock producers create a lot more than 15 good images a month. In addition, iStock’s editing process seems to have slowed tremendously due to staffing issues, resulting in a much longer time to market than with other brands.



Photographers trying to make a living shooting microstock needs to get a lot of images in play in order to make a living licensing them at $2 to $3 each. IStock is not giving them that opportunity. Consequently, iStock is driving some of the best shooters to the other microstock brands. One top microstock photographer estimates that there are currently over 400,000 good saleable images available in other brands that can’t be found on iStock due to its editing strategies. Limiting customers choices may not be a winning strategy for iStock.


During the conference call, Getty Images CEO Jonathan Klein acknowledged it is “very hard for us to validate (market dominance) as we don't know the size of the market.” But, he said iStock has 600,000 customers who have actually purchased images and that “means that people who want to submit their imagery as amateurs to a site will go to the site where the action is. Customers who are looking for imagery and looking for a community, we'll go to that place where the product is.”

Taking all these factors into consideration, I'm not convinced that iStock will dominate the microstock space -- and I do expect increasing competition there.




Copyright © 2007 Jim Pickerell. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-251-0720, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

Jim Pickerell is founder of www.selling-stock.com, an online newsletter that publishes daily. He is also available for personal telephone consultations on pricing and other matters related to stock photography. He occasionally acts as an expert witness on matters related to stock photography. For his current curriculum vitae go to: http://www.jimpickerell.com/Curriculum-Vitae.aspx.  

Comments

  • Kara Udziela Posted Nov 6, 2007
    Hello, Jim:

    Unfortunately, your hypothesis here is predicated on limited and erroneous information. I recognize you are often dealing in thin air and few data points, and that we in the industry are often hampered in our ability to give you enough info to complete your analysis. However, please check with me or someone at iStock before writing a whole theory on something like this without checking the facts. We will always try to be responsive. Here are current, accurate levels of upload capabilities. I will also be sending you another survey done in Canada just a few months ago that shows similar leadership numbers for iStock as does the Piper Jaffrey survey.

    We are currently inspecting approximately 40,000-50,000 images every 4-5 days, which represents an increase over six months ago, not a slow down. Here meanwhile are our real upload limits which are far from the lowest 15 mentioned above. At the same time, we do have limits because we want photographers to think about what they are uploading, and submit quality work that will pass our inspection process.

    Upload limits for non-exclusive contributors:

    Base: 15
    Bronze: 20
    Silver: 25
    Gold : 30
    Diamond: 35
    Black Diamond: 40

    Upload limits for exclusive contributors:

    Bronze: 60
    Silver: 90
    Gold: 120
    Diamond: 150
    Black Diamond: 200

    Over 168 hour period for each

    I hope this clears things up.

    Thanks for your consideration,

    Kara Udziela
    iStockphoto

Post Comment

You must log in to post comments.

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive our FREE weekly email listing new stories posted.

Follow Us

Free Stuff

Recent Stories – Summer 2016
If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
Read More
Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
Read More
Finding The Right Image
Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
Read More
Where Is The Stock Photo Industry Headed?
For new readers, or those who may have missed some of what I have written over the last few months, the following are a list of stories worth looking at to get a sense of where the industry is headed.
Read More
Photography As A Career
It’s that time of year when high school seniors are waiting for college acceptance letters and thinking about future careers. If you know someone who is thinking about photography as a career you mig...
Read More
2014 Stories You May Have Missed
For many the end of the year is a time to review past experiences and consider whether it makes sense to chart a new course in the year ahead. Stock photography has changed dramatically for professio...
Read More
More Stories In 2014 You May Have Missed
Every so often I put together a list of the most important stories we’ve published in the recent past. If you are engaged in the business of stock photography the links below are to stories that we’v...
Read More
Getty: A Three Month Review
In all the excitement about 35 million FREE images it is worth looking back at some of things that have been happening at Getty Images in the last three months. After watching revenue decline for the...
Read More
State Of Stock Photo Industry: 2013
If you’re looking for an overview of the state of the stock photo industry as of October 2013 the stories listed below are a good place to start. Regular readers of Selling-Stock will have seen all t...
Read More
Education Market Shifts To Digital
If supplying pictures for educational use is a significant part of your business plan you need to be aware of how the market is trending toward digital delivery and how that is likely to affect the p...
Read More

More from Free Stuff