Downside To PicScout

Posted on 3/8/2005 by Jim Pickerell | Printable Version | Comments (0)



March 8, 2005

Everyone in the stock photo industry is excited by the potential PicScout is offering in identifying unauthorized web uses and making it possible for many to collect additional revenue for the use of their images.

Zefa was able to collect in excess of 20,000 euros for the unauthorized uses discovered in the first ten days of using PicScout. Index Stock Imagery located about 300 questionable uses in a month, and Superstock says they uncovered a potential of $140,000 in unauthorized uses in the first month of using PicScout.

Customer's Dilemma

But let's consider, for the moment, the dilemma facing some of those unauthorized users - our customers.

I recently talked to one who operates a small Web Site Development company in the mid-west. There are two things that go into the development of good web sites - programming and design. My source said, "Most designers don't make good programmers, and most programmers don't make good designers." In most cases it is the programmer, or the programming side of the business, that initially obtains the contract to develop a web site. In many cases the programmer then sub-contracts the design work to a freelance designer. It is the designer who chooses the photographs.

Often the designer is not located in the same city as the programmer. They communicate mostly through the web and occasionally by telephone. The programmer has little way of determining whether the designer is well established in his or her profession, or will be out of business next week.

This particular development company has a term in its contract with designers saying, "You fully warrant that any images you include in layouts are royalty-free images that you own the rights to or have purchased for the project and assume the legal responsibility of all images used unless otherwise specified in a quote." But that term is useless if they can't locate the designer after the job is complete.

My source also pointed out that even if the designer was required to provide receipts upon completing the work, they may not cover the actual images used. If the RF CDs were purchased at a trade show the receipt may just say, "5 royalty-free image CDs". This programmer has received such receipts from shows such as Photoshop World and in some cases the trade show sellers won't even provide a receipt unless the buyer specifically asks.

Another problem is the growing tendency of many designers to use Google to search for images. By doing such a search the designer may find an RM image that was used on another company's online brochure or web site. That image may have been properly licensed for the initial use, but if the designer grabs it "because it was on the web" (and many think that anything on the web is public domain) how does the producer know.

Image sellers might point out that many of these problems could be solved if the development companies would simply do all their design work with in-house staff, fully under their control. But skilled designers are very expensive and need to be kept working full time to justify their salary. Many companies that produce 15 to 30 web sites a year can't justify this expense. In addition, developers working in small town America often don't have access to good designers in their local area.

Specific Problem

All this came to a head recently when I received a call from a web site developer asking for advice as to how she might protect her company in the future. She had just discovered that one of her designers who had done work for her two years earlier had used a RM image that wasn't properly licensed rather than RF. The image was not used just once, but small (as a logo) on every page of the site. PicScout located this use while doing searches for a major stock agency. The agency calculated the value of the usage and penalties at $18,000.

Unfortunately, the web developer is stuck with the obligation. The designer she used cannot be located and is probably out of business. The total fee her company received for the site it developed for a small local company was $3,000. An $18,000 hit could drive her company out of business. Once notified the developer immediately removed the image from the site, and is now trying to negotiate a settlement she can afford.

No Simple Solutions

Unfortunately, I was unable to offer this woman a simple solution for the future. She had a contract with her sub-contractor but the sub-contractor has disappeared. Doing everything in-house is not an option in her location.

As an industry, if we are really concerned about the customers, we need to do more to help them be honest. If any of my readers have suggestions as to what the industry should do I would be very interested in publishing them. The following are a few of my thoughts.

  • We need to find a better way to help our customers identify whether a particular image is RM or RF, the name of the company that owns the image, the name of the company or distributor that licensed usage rights to the image and the duration of the license. If this information were to appear in the IPTC header of every image licensed and stayed with that image or any part of the image no matter how it was cropped, and if the customer could easily access this information at anytime, it could go a long way toward solving the problem of innocent infringement.

    To a great extent this is a software problem that is fixable. Based on discussions that have taken place in industry association meetings, I believe the problem is being addressed by Adobe. But once the software is available, then all sellers must use it.

    Granted, it would probably be impossible to supply the buyer information when a CD is licensed, but if the name of the company that produced the CD and the title of the CD were in the image header of every image on the CD it would be possible to track all sales of that CD and determine if it had been purchased by a particular customer. This won't solve the problem for all the images already out there, but it would be a positive step moving forward.

  • We need to do a better job of educating customers as to why some images are RM and the risks they assume in using them. For most web site uses there are very few companies that can justify the expense of a RM image when the pricing is based on time.
    On the other hand, most RM suppliers can't afford to cut their prices down to where web site developers could afford to use them, given the costs of producing and delivering
    these images. Going forward, there needs to be an easy way to determine if an image is RF or RM.

  • Part of the purpose of using PicScout is to educate customers and identify potential new customers, not put customers out of business. It is hard to get a handle on the percentage of total stock photo revenue that is generated from relatively small sales to small design firms, but I think it is significant and a segment of the market the industry cannot afford to alienate. Sellers will probably need to exercise great flexibility in how they charge for unauthorized web uses and develop penalties in each case that fit the crime.

  • I'm not saying that we shouldn't charge for the online use of our RM images. Certainly we must do that and the fee must be high enough that it discourages any production company from doing the same thing again. But, maybe, there should be a cap that the fee is no more than the total amount the production company received for doing the project. That's a severe penalty, but not enough to drive a small company out of business.

  • Copyright © 2005 Jim Pickerell. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-461-7627, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

    Jim Pickerell is founder of, an online newsletter that publishes daily. He is also available for personal telephone consultations on pricing and other matters related to stock photography. He occasionally acts as an expert witness on matters related to stock photography. For his current curriculum vitae go to:  


    Be the first to comment below.

    Post Comment

    Please log in or create an account to post comments.

    Stay Connected

    Sign up to receive email notification when new stories are posted.

    Follow Us

    Free Stuff

    Stock Photo Pricing: The Future
    In the last two years I have written a lot about stock photo pricing and its downward slide. If you have time over the holidays you may want to review some of these stories as you plan your strategy ...
    Read More
    Future Of Stock Photography
    If you’re a photographer that counts on the licensing of stock images to provide a portion of your annual income the following are a few stories you should read. In the past decade stock photography ...
    Read More
    Blockchain Stories
    The opening session at this year’s CEPIC Congress in Berlin on May 30, 2018 is entitled “Can Blockchain be applied to the Photo Industry?” For those who would like to know more about the existing blo...
    Read More
    2017 Stories Worth Reviewing
    The following are links to some 2017 and early 2018 stories that might be worth reviewing as we move into the new year.
    Read More
    Stories Related To Stock Photo Pricing
    The following are links to stories that deal with stock photo pricing trends. Probably the biggest problem the industry has faced in recent years has been the steady decline in prices for the use of ...
    Read More
    Stock Photo Prices: The Future
    This story is FREE. Feel free to pass it along to anyone interested in licensing their work as stock photography. On October 23rd at the DMLA 2017 Conference in New York there will be a panel discuss...
    Read More
    Important Stock Photo Industry Issues
    Here are links to recent stories that deal with three major issues for the stock photo industry – Revenue Growth Potential, Setting Bottom Line On Pricing and Future Production Sources.
    Read More
    Recent Stories – Summer 2016
    If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
    Read More
    Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
    This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
    Read More
    Finding The Right Image
    Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
    Read More

    More from Free Stuff