Getty And the Investment Community

Posted on 11/26/1999 by Jim Pickerell | Printable Version | Comments (0)

266

GETTY AND THE INVESTMENT COMMUNITY

=5>


November 26, 1999

Getty Images has finally convinced the investment community that their company

should be treated like other hot internet stocks.

Their recent stock offering to raise the capital to purchase The Image Bank was

managed by Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. The prestige of this investment banking firm, plus the

story Getty had to tell to the investment community seems to have turned the trick

with investors.

When the intent to acquire was announced in September, Getty's stock was selling at

$23 per share. Their announced intent was to sell five million shares to raise part

of the funds to pay the $183 million acquisition cost for The Image Bank. They

predicted at

the time that the rest of the money, needed for the all cash sale, would come from

their current cash.

After going on the road to explain the value of their company to major wall street

investors, they were able to sell six million shares at $39 per share and raise more

than enough to pay for the entire acquisition. The stock is now trading at around

$43 per share. The investment bankers also exercised their option to buy an

addition 900,000 shares at the offering price. These 6,900,000 shares raised Getty's

total shares outstanding to 43,968,658.

After the offering Getty ended up with extra cash of something in excess of $50

million in cash in addition to The Image Bank.

Third Quarter

Getty reported third quarter 1999 sales at $60.8 million and total sales in the

first nine months of 1999 of $167.9 million.

Sales were up $5.8 million over the previous quarter, or about an 11% growth

quarter-to-quarter. However, during the quarter Getty had new acquisitions of

EyeWire and Online USA. The income of these two companies combined was probably in

the range

of $2.8 million (this is an estimate, not a publicly reported number) and thus the

real quarter-to-quarter growth of the Getty business that existed on July 1 was

probably more in the range of $3 million, or 5% over the previous quarter.

Meanwhile, late last month at Photo Expo in New York, John Hallberg, President of

TSI and Hutton Getty, was telling photographers in private meetings that TSI had 25%

growth in the previous quarter and was forecasting 40% growth in the final quarter

of 1999.

E-commerce sales

Getty's e-commerce sales for the third quarter of 1999 were $19.4 million, or about

32% of sales. This was up from 25% of gross sale in the second quarter.

Year-to-date e-commerce are $43.4 million or 26% of all sales year-to-date.

Road Show

The following are some of the points Getty made to the investment community in

making their case for a greater valuation of their company.

BancBoston Robertson Stephens, the leading underwriter of Getty before Morgan Stanley

took over, and

the preparer of much of the written material provided investors said, "Getty is

delivering on its consolidation strategy in a substantial vertical (market) which is

estimated to be in the $35-$45 billion range."

We have no idea what market they are talking about. There was no further

explanation of these numbers and presumably, investors took them on faith and didn't

ask.

When investors asked in-house people at Getty about the current size of the stock

photo market they were told that it is between $4 and $5 billion. (I have estimated

the current stock photo market worldwide in the range of 1.25 billion, not 5 billion. Corbis

was using this same 1.25 billion number in talks they gave at the recent PACA

conference.)

If the market were 5 billion, Getty and TIB combined would only control 6% of it.

If it is in the range of 1.25 billion as I estimate Getty already controls 24% of

the market.

In its report to investors BancBoston Robertson Stephens highlights the following reasons why

e-commerce introduces significant benefits to the Getty Images business model:

    Higher margins - lower distribution costs and fewer salespeople

    Greater tranaction volume - from 310 to 1,520 tranactions per day

    Higher average sale - 1.8 to 2.1 images per transaction

    Lower transaction time - 7 weeks to 20 minutes

    Increased selection and improved customer service

    Lower inventory costs - from $238/image to $45/image

These points are worth some examination.

  • Higher margins - lower distribution costs and fewer salespeople

    There is no indication that there has been a reduction in the number of salespeople

    or

    in the number of Getty's staff. In fact, in April they were reporting a staff of

    1,300, now they are saying it is 1,600 and with the completion of The Image Bank

    acquisition that number should jump to about 2075. There may be a sales staff

    reduction in inhouse picture researchers, but these people will be replaced by other

    worker categories such as keyworders and people to manage the on-line database.

    There are also indications that Getty may be losing

    ground in certain segments of the business, noteably textbooks, due to a change in

    focus away from picture research. This market segment may eventually be lost to

    other suppliers in the industry who continue to operate in a more traditional manner.

  • Greater tranaction volume - from 310 to 1,520 tranactions per day

    They don't specify the period in which these numbers were collected, or tell the

    investor enough about how they were collected to make reasonable judgements about

    what they mean.

    There is at least one scenario where these numbers tend to look more negative

    than positive.

    Assume that the 310 were when there were no e-commerce sales and that the average

    sale

    was $400. That would be $124,000 per day. If the average sale was $300 it would be

    $93,000 per day. Now, assume that a high percentage of the 1,520 sales are individual

    PhotoDisc images sold online at an average price of $75 per transaction, or lower.

    That works out to $114,000 per day. At the rates PhotoDisc is charging for single

    image uses compared to what they were charging for discs, or traditional analog

    prices the 5 times growth in transactions is not necessarily all that impressive.

    The 1,520 transactions is probably only the e-commerce transactions, and doesn't take

    into account, in any way, other analog transactions that are taking place. One

    major factor to consider is the number former analog buyers who are now paying less

    money for their imagery because they can get it online.

    At one point Getty says they are generating $250,000 per day in e-commerce revenues.

    If there are 1,520 transactions that would produce an average transaction price for

    a 365 day year of $684.93. This fits nicely with the 2.1 images per transaction which

    makes the average fee per image $326.16.

    If they continually producing $250,000 per day in e-commerce revenue that would make

    annual e-commerce revenue for 260 days (a 5 day week) $65 million, or over $91

    million for a 365 day year. By their own admission they aren't there yet. Thus, the

    $250,000 is probably the best day they have had so far and the big question is what is

    lost on the analog side of the business when that $250,000 becomes the average on an

    annual basis.

  • Higher average sale - 1.8 to 2.1 images per transaction

    If the average number of images licensed per transaction was 1.8 when they were

    making analog sales and is now 2.1 on the web, this is not particularly encouraging,

    if average rates per transaction on the web are significantly lower.

  • Lower transaction time - 7 weeks to 20 minutes

    This implies major collection problems (7 weeks) with all clients using the

    traditional analog system. Most agencies don't have collection problems of this

    magnitude although collections, industry wide, is a problem. On the other hand the 20

    minutes implies that everyone using e-commerce is paying by credit card. That certainly is not the

    case. Getty conveniently fails to tell us what percentage of the on-line sales they invoice

    in the traditional manner. Certainly, e-commerce has done absolutely nothing to

    encourage large companies to change their payment policies on invoices. Collecting

    on these invoices is going to require a lot of time of a lot of sales people whether

    the sale is made on-line or not.

  • Increased selection and improved customer service

    Online sales are not offering increased selection. Just the opposite. Getty, and

    all the other sellers, have no plans to make every image in their files available

    on-line. The cost of scanning and keywording make this prohibitive. Getty's

    current editing process, and their focus of moving to 100% e-commerce, is limiting the options

    available to the consumer, not increasing them. This is opening opportunities for

    specialist agencies that are prepared to maintain and update files with a greater

    depth of coverage, and who are prepared to do more research for the customers.

    Lower inventory costs - from $238/image to $45/image

    This is a very interesting set of numbers. If they are achieving such savings in

    inventory costs why are the photographers -- the creators of this inventory --

    getting a lower percentage (40% instead of 50% at TSI and below 20% at PhotoDisc) of

    the gross sale? Certainly the lower cost is partially achieved because they are now

    paying less to the suppliers for their inventory. The story they tell the image

    suppliers and the story they tell investors don't quite mesh.

    Another factor that may have a lot to do with the lower cost is that a higher

    percentage of the e-commerce sales are coming from PhotoDisc and Eyewire who are

    paying 20% of less for their inventory rather than the 40% TSI pays.

    Getty says that in the 2nd quarter 25% of TSI's sales were generarted on-line, but

    45% of PhotoDisc's sales were generated in this manner. One thing we don't

    know is the percentage of PhotoDisc's online sales that were for individual images

    and the percentage that were for discs. The disc sales probably generate on average

    around $250 per disc, but it is likely that the single image sales generate one-third

    or less of the $250 figure.

    Other Points

    Quoting from their press release, "Registered users on all Getty Images websites

    reached

    almost 440,000 at the end of the quarter." This was certainly due in large part to

    the acquisition of Eyewire which has a large database of registered users, not all

    them purchasers of still images. Eyewire sells Adobe software, among other

    products.

    In addition it is not clear that Getty has a single consolidated database across all

    brands. If there is no such database a user who has purchased a product from

    PhotoDisc, one from TSI and one from Eyewire could be counted three times, not once.

    Market Capitalization

    Getty has a current Market Capitalization (shares X share price) of about $1.8

    billion which is about six times their gross annual sales. It should be noted that

    in addition to the 43,968,658 shares outstanding Getty has convertible shares and

    options which raise the total market value of their shares.

    Shares outstanding after deal   

    43,968,658   

    Shares from convertible   

    2,600,000   

    Options outstanding at $15   

    7,819,264   

    Total Shares   

    54,387,922   

      

      

    Stock Price   

    $ 42   

    Taking into account the debt reduction from conversion, the cash proceeds from

    option coversion, the excess net cash from the recent offering, and the cash on hand

    as of September 30, 1999 Getty has a current market value of their shares of about

    $2,284,292,724, over seven times their annual earnings.

    Summary

    Jonathan Klein and his team must be given tremendous credit for convincing the stock

    market to invest more than $234 million in Getty Images. But some experienced

    individuals within the stock photo industry who have a solid understanding of the

    photo buyers, and what motivates them, question the wisdom

    of the investors.


  • Copyright © 1999 Jim Pickerell. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-251-0720, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

    Jim Pickerell is founder of www.selling-stock.com, an online newsletter that publishes daily. He is also available for personal telephone consultations on pricing and other matters related to stock photography. He occasionally acts as an expert witness on matters related to stock photography. For his current curriculum vitae go to: http://www.jimpickerell.com/Curriculum-Vitae.aspx.  

    Comments

    Be the first to comment below.

    Post Comment

    You must log in to post comments.

    Stay Connected

    Sign up to receive our FREE weekly email listing new stories posted.

    Follow Us

    Free Stuff

    Recent Stories – Summer 2016
    If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
    Read More
    Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
    This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
    Read More
    Finding The Right Image
    Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
    Read More
    Where Is The Stock Photo Industry Headed?
    For new readers, or those who may have missed some of what I have written over the last few months, the following are a list of stories worth looking at to get a sense of where the industry is headed.
    Read More
    Photography As A Career
    It’s that time of year when high school seniors are waiting for college acceptance letters and thinking about future careers. If you know someone who is thinking about photography as a career you mig...
    Read More
    2014 Stories You May Have Missed
    For many the end of the year is a time to review past experiences and consider whether it makes sense to chart a new course in the year ahead. Stock photography has changed dramatically for professio...
    Read More
    More Stories In 2014 You May Have Missed
    Every so often I put together a list of the most important stories we’ve published in the recent past. If you are engaged in the business of stock photography the links below are to stories that we’v...
    Read More
    Getty: A Three Month Review
    In all the excitement about 35 million FREE images it is worth looking back at some of things that have been happening at Getty Images in the last three months. After watching revenue decline for the...
    Read More
    State Of Stock Photo Industry: 2013
    If you’re looking for an overview of the state of the stock photo industry as of October 2013 the stories listed below are a good place to start. Regular readers of Selling-Stock will have seen all t...
    Read More
    Education Market Shifts To Digital
    If supplying pictures for educational use is a significant part of your business plan you need to be aware of how the market is trending toward digital delivery and how that is likely to affect the p...
    Read More

    More from Free Stuff