Insurer Must Defend McGraw-Hill In Infringement Case

Posted on 1/14/2020 by Jim Pickerell | Printable Version | Comments (0)

A New York State appeals court overturned a lower court’s ruling and held that an insurer must defend McGraw-Hill Education Inc. in underlying copyright litigation in the case of McGraw-Hill Educ., Inc. v. Ill. Nat’l Ins. Co.

McGraw-Hill is a learning science company and educational publisher that provides customized educational content software and services, and also publishes reference and trade books for several professions. Over the last few years, McGraw-Hill has faced several actions alleging copyright infringement with AIG-affiliated insurers refusing to defend and indemnify.

McGraw-Hill had entered into licensing agreements with third-party photographers and stock photography agencies, which limited the parameters of the usage of the images. The lawsuits alleged that McGraw-Hill’s usage of the images in textbooks and other publications exceeded the scope of the agreements between the two parties.



McGraw-Hill sought a defense from its insurers.

The insurers denied coverage based on policy exclusions for claims arising out of a contract, and claims arising out of the intentional violation of law. They also argued that the claimed losses were not fortuitous because McGraw-Hill’s actions were willful, and therefore, were not covered. The insurers further argued that McGraw-Hill’s management was aware of the legal risks of using the photographs for years before the lawsuits were filed.



The trial court denied both parties’ motions for summary judgment, ruling that there were questions of fact about the intentional wrongdoing and fortuity issues. The Appellate Division First Department reversed and granted summary judgment for McGraw-Hill, holding that the insurers had a duty to defend in the underlying suit. The court found that the exclusions for claims arising out a contract did not apply in this case because the claims could have been brought even if the contracts had not been violated.

The other exclusion cited by the insurers — the one barring coverage for claims arising out of the intentional violation of law or gaining profit or advantage that the insurer is not entitled to — barred coverage, in part, but only in cases where it is “judicially determined” that the violation is intentional. Since there was no such judicial determination, the exclusion did not apply.

The court finally held that the fortuity doctrine did not bar coverage because the policy was intended to provide coverage for claims arising out of “infringement of common law or statutory copyright,” and invoking the fortuity doctrine would “render that portion of the policy illusory.”



The case is McGraw-Hill Educ., Inc. v. Ill. Nat’l Ins. Co., 2019 NY Slip Op 08960 (App. Div. 1st Dept.).


Copyright © 2020 Jim Pickerell. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-461-7627, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

Comments

Be the first to comment below.

Post Comment

Please log in or create an account to post comments.

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive email notification when new stories are posted.

Follow Us

Free Stuff

Stock Photo Pricing: The Future
In the last two years I have written a lot about stock photo pricing and its downward slide. If you have time over the holidays you may want to review some of these stories as you plan your strategy ...
Read More
Future Of Stock Photography
If you’re a photographer that counts on the licensing of stock images to provide a portion of your annual income the following are a few stories you should read. In the past decade stock photography ...
Read More
Blockchain Stories
The opening session at this year’s CEPIC Congress in Berlin on May 30, 2018 is entitled “Can Blockchain be applied to the Photo Industry?” For those who would like to know more about the existing blo...
Read More
2017 Stories Worth Reviewing
The following are links to some 2017 and early 2018 stories that might be worth reviewing as we move into the new year.
Read More
Stories Related To Stock Photo Pricing
The following are links to stories that deal with stock photo pricing trends. Probably the biggest problem the industry has faced in recent years has been the steady decline in prices for the use of ...
Read More
Stock Photo Prices: The Future
This story is FREE. Feel free to pass it along to anyone interested in licensing their work as stock photography. On October 23rd at the DMLA 2017 Conference in New York there will be a panel discuss...
Read More
Important Stock Photo Industry Issues
Here are links to recent stories that deal with three major issues for the stock photo industry – Revenue Growth Potential, Setting Bottom Line On Pricing and Future Production Sources.
Read More
Recent Stories – Summer 2016
If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
Read More
Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
Read More
Finding The Right Image
Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
Read More

More from Free Stuff