Join the Fight Against Online Copyright Infringement

Posted on 10/21/2010 by Jim Pickerell | Printable Version | Comments (2)

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce estimates that online rights infringements costs the U.S. economy roughly $58 billion in total output every year, more than 370,000 domestic jobs and $16.3 billion in earnings. It also is costs an estimated $2.6 billion in state, local and federal tax revenue, so the government has some incentive to fight such infringement.

The Copyright Alliance Network—which includes the American Society of Media Photographers, the American Society of Picture Professionals, the Picture Archive Council of America and many other trade associations interested in copyright protection—has been lobbying the U.S. Congress for tougher rules and laws that will help combat online infringement and theft.

A bill, known as S. 3804 and titled the “Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act” is now working its way through U.S. Senate hearings. Now is the time for anyone interested in copyright protection to contact their senators and congress men or women. Thanks to a form developed by, it has never been easier. Go here, enter your name and address, and the form letter will be sent to your senators and congressperson. If anything is going to happen, Members of Congress need to know that a lot of photographers care and are being hurt by the current lack of protection.

The following is the letter that will be sent:

Please co-sponsor and support S. 3804, the “Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act,” an innovative new initiative to combat online intellectual property theft.

The theft of copyrighted works like photography, music, movies, books, software and games is a devastating problem. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce estimates such theft costs our nation's economy roughly $58 billion in total output every year; more than 370,000 domestic jobs; $16.3 billion in earnings; and $2.6 billion in tax revenue for state, local, and federal governments.

This rampant theft inhibits the ability of American businesses to invest and innovate—and stifles the capacity of American artists and creators to earn a living, support their families, and invest in their own creative development.

Slick, professional-looking websites that operate without the authorization of, or compensation to, artists and producers have increasingly become a tool of thieves around the world. Such sites deceive consumers because they carry advertisements for Fortune 500 companies and process transactions with major credit cards. S. 3804 would give the Department of Justice an expedited process for cracking down on such rogue entities. The Justice Department would target the most egregious pirate websites, go to a federal court with the evidence, and then seize the domain name. Once a site has been seized, the Court would issue an order to intermediaries—such as ISPs, payment processors, Internet registries and registrars, advertisers, etc.—that prohibits them from doing business with such rogue sites.

This legislation represents a significant step forward in our nation's approach to our piracy and counterfeiting crisis. Please support this important measure.

Copyright © Jim Pickerell. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-251-0720, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

Jim Pickerell is founder of, an online newsletter that publishes daily. He is also available for personal telephone consultations on pricing and other matters related to stock photography. He occasionally acts as an expert witness on matters related to stock photography. For his current curriculum vitae go to:  


  • Robert Henson Posted Oct 22, 2010
    Jim, thanks for posting this. Selling Stock subscribers, please take the few seconds required to do a small part in protecting copyright.

    Rob Henson

  • David Sanger Posted Oct 22, 2010
    I wonder if this bill will really do anything to help photographers. If you read the bill, it says it is focussed on sites ‘dedicated to infringing activities’ but the definition is quite vague and could draw in many consumer sites like Flickr and Youtube which are part of contemporary culture and not really a threat to commercial photography. It is also likely to face court challenge.

    I think this is being pushed by the movie industry and recording label corporations under the guise of 'protecting creators'.

    The real problem for photographers is not online infringement but competition and an oversupply of images.

    ref: S. 3804 -

Post Comment

You must log in to post comments.

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive our FREE weekly email listing new stories posted.

Follow Us

Free Stuff

Recent Stories – Summer 2016
If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
Read More
Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
Read More
Finding The Right Image
Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
Read More
Where Is The Stock Photo Industry Headed?
For new readers, or those who may have missed some of what I have written over the last few months, the following are a list of stories worth looking at to get a sense of where the industry is headed.
Read More
Photography As A Career
It’s that time of year when high school seniors are waiting for college acceptance letters and thinking about future careers. If you know someone who is thinking about photography as a career you mig...
Read More
2014 Stories You May Have Missed
For many the end of the year is a time to review past experiences and consider whether it makes sense to chart a new course in the year ahead. Stock photography has changed dramatically for professio...
Read More
More Stories In 2014 You May Have Missed
Every so often I put together a list of the most important stories we’ve published in the recent past. If you are engaged in the business of stock photography the links below are to stories that we’v...
Read More
Getty: A Three Month Review
In all the excitement about 35 million FREE images it is worth looking back at some of things that have been happening at Getty Images in the last three months. After watching revenue decline for the...
Read More
State Of Stock Photo Industry: 2013
If you’re looking for an overview of the state of the stock photo industry as of October 2013 the stories listed below are a good place to start. Regular readers of Selling-Stock will have seen all t...
Read More
Education Market Shifts To Digital
If supplying pictures for educational use is a significant part of your business plan you need to be aware of how the market is trending toward digital delivery and how that is likely to affect the p...
Read More

More from Free Stuff