Microstock Propaganda: "No Impact on Top Pros"

Posted on 8/27/2008 by Jim Pickerell | Printable Version | Comments (3)

It seems that every amateur who's made a few bucks selling microstock writes a blog extolling the virtues of microstock and encouraging other amateurs to try selling their images. I've got no problem with them telling their stories. But in their enthusiasm to encourage others, they often put out inaccurate information about the effects microstock is having on those trying to make a living shooting stock images.


Get the Full Article (1 Credit)

Have an Account?

Access to this site is an exclusive benefit for you. Enter your username and password in the form above. If you don't remember your password you can reset it at any time.


Forgot your password?

New to Selling Stock?

Selling Stock is a subscription based on-line newsletter that reports on developing trends in the stock photo industry. It is updated at least twice a month. On-line subscribers receive e-mail notification whenever new stories are posted. Archives containing stories going back to late 1995 are fully available to subscribers.


Copyright © 2008 Jim Pickerell. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-251-0720, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

Jim Pickerell is founder of www.selling-stock.com, an online newsletter that publishes daily. He is also available for personal telephone consultations on pricing and other matters related to stock photography. He occasionally acts as an expert witness on matters related to stock photography. For his current curriculum vitae go to: http://www.jimpickerell.com/Curriculum-Vitae.aspx.  

Comments

  • Ron Chapple Posted Aug 28, 2008
    Hi Jim,

    All good points, and as a photographer with collections in all pricing sectors, I can confirm flat or downward trends in traditional RF sales.

    One point missed... a well-known "secret" in microstock is that many shooters make good revenue from referring others to microstock sites through affiliate and referral links. These blogs serve as the conduit for these links. There's probably not a microstock link out there in the microstock blog world that doesn't have the contributor's referral code built in.

    On the traditional side, I'm not sure I know of any agencies that have the mechanism to reward photographers for referring other photographers or clients to their web sites. If so, I think we would see many more microstock photographers extolling traditional RF and RM virtues- there's simply a money trail in the referral business.

    Hope you're doing well!

    Ron

  • Lee Torrens Posted Aug 28, 2008
    Hi Jim,

    That article you cite is plagiarized. The original, actually written by myself, is here: http://digital-photography-school.com/blog/microstock-for-digital-photography-students-make-money-from-your-photography/

    In my defense, the statement about microstock not affecting top professionals was based on first hand comments received from Jack Hollingsworth and John Lund, whose websites I linked to in the article - links which were stripped out in the stolen version you found. Since that time I've learned more about that situation (including more detail from Jack), so I can understand your criticism has some justification.

    Also, Ron makes a great point in his comment. Microstock agencies are leveraging the crowd to source contributors. My blog is written to help microstockers, not because I'm a nice guy, but because by helping people sell more photos I earn more money, and I make no secret of this fact - it's explained on my About page. Many photographers prefer the PhotoShelter and Alamy business models, but without referral programs, it's more in their interests to keep them a secret than to promote them.

    I'm not saying I'm a slave to microstock referral programs as some blogs and articles are. My focus is on helping readers as it will be obvious if I'm just 'selling' and nobody will come back. I've written many posts about Alamy, PhotoShelter and other traditional opportunities because they're of interest to my readers, but there's less incentive for me to promote them. I've also written many criticisms about microstock agencies from whom I earn referral income. By focusing on helping people sell more photos, the referral income naturally follows, albeit rather slowly!

    -Lee

  • Don Farrall Posted Aug 28, 2008
    Microstock has unquestionably had an adverse effect on the sale of traditional stock photography, and for that matter, on assignment photography as well. I have Ad Agency clients who’s customers now believe that all photography is overpriced, because of the availability of “cheap” photos that are good enough for many of their projects. I don’t expect any sympathy from amateurs on this front; they are playing, having fun and making enough money to pay for some equipment. I don’t have any issue with this level of competition. But I am disappointed at the professional level photographers who are willing to give away so much. Some of the “top level microstock shooters” express that they would like to move up into the higher paying traditional stock arena, and established professional stock shooters wish they would. There was a time when moving these photographers, and the best of their portfolios, up to a traditional price point agency, would have made more money for them. Now the problem is, they have to compete with so many similar images being sold for so little that it is questionable weather the move up would result in enough sales and revenue, they have killed the goose that lays the golden eggs.

    The top ten microstock producers, world wide, are reportedly making reasonable money for their efforts. There isn’t any way to know what the negative impact of their sales on traditional stock sales has been, but it is certainly substantial.

    It is my understanding that as recently as a few years ago, traditional stock sales provided hundreds of photographers with annual sales in excess of $100,000. ( I am one of those, and remain so ) Microstock reportedly provides a hand full of photographers with annual sales in this range. The number of traditional stock shooters making a sustainable living from their stock sales is in rapid decline, much more rapid than the increase on the microstock side. In the near future we are headed toward fewer photographers being able to justify shooting stock as a fulltime endeavor. The market is over-saturated with under-priced photos.

    I believe the solution lies in getting a higher value for all images used in a commercial context from all image providers, but making this happen in a greed-driven, short-sided market is going to be very difficult.

    Don Farrall
    www.donfarrall.com

Post Comment

You must log in to post comments.

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive our FREE weekly email listing new stories posted.

Follow Us

Free Stuff

Recent Stories – Summer 2016
If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
Read More
Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
Read More
Finding The Right Image
Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
Read More
Where Is The Stock Photo Industry Headed?
For new readers, or those who may have missed some of what I have written over the last few months, the following are a list of stories worth looking at to get a sense of where the industry is headed.
Read More
Photography As A Career
It’s that time of year when high school seniors are waiting for college acceptance letters and thinking about future careers. If you know someone who is thinking about photography as a career you mig...
Read More
2014 Stories You May Have Missed
For many the end of the year is a time to review past experiences and consider whether it makes sense to chart a new course in the year ahead. Stock photography has changed dramatically for professio...
Read More
More Stories In 2014 You May Have Missed
Every so often I put together a list of the most important stories we’ve published in the recent past. If you are engaged in the business of stock photography the links below are to stories that we’v...
Read More
Getty: A Three Month Review
In all the excitement about 35 million FREE images it is worth looking back at some of things that have been happening at Getty Images in the last three months. After watching revenue decline for the...
Read More
State Of Stock Photo Industry: 2013
If you’re looking for an overview of the state of the stock photo industry as of October 2013 the stories listed below are a good place to start. Regular readers of Selling-Stock will have seen all t...
Read More
Education Market Shifts To Digital
If supplying pictures for educational use is a significant part of your business plan you need to be aware of how the market is trending toward digital delivery and how that is likely to affect the p...
Read More

More from Free Stuff