NAFP Loses First Round to AP

Posted on 1/6/1998 by Jim Pickerell | Printable Version | Comments (0)



January 6, 1998

In early December the National Association of Freelance Photographers lost the
first round in their suit against Associated Press.

NAFP members claim they own the copyright to images which they produced on
freelance assignments for Associated Press. They are seeking a share of the
payments for secondary usages of their images when rights are licensed to
non-members of the AP. AP normally charges a per image fee for such uses.

U.S. District Judge Denise L. Cote dismissed five of six counts in NAFP's claim
against AP, but indicated that copyright ownership claims could still be brought
by specific plaintiffs.

The primary complaint was that AP required the photographers, as a condition of
sale, to surrender copyright and future earnings from the resale of their

The fundamental issue in the case was whether AP's legend on the face of every
check transfers the copyright when the photographer endorses the check for

The legend in question reads: "In consideration of the transfer of any and all
copyrighted ownership in the news materials described above. Endorsement
signifies consent."

Judge Cote dismissed NAFP claims on the grounds that NAFP does not meet the
requirements of legal standing. Given that there will be slightly different
considerations in each plaintiffs claim she concluded NAFP would be unable to
testify as to these agreements and understandings. She held that individual
plaintiff's need to be named in order to provide actual facts on a case-by-case

"We are disappointed in the ruling," said Kevin Larkin, president of NAFP, "but
we're encouraged to see that the judge does see merit in our claims." The judge
indicated that AP's check legend might not be sufficient to transfer copyright
depending on the understanding of the photographer through all other related

"The fact that the NAFP does not have legal standing to represent our members
simply means that we will have to re-file some of our charges naming individual
plaintiffs rather than the organization as plaintiff," Larkin continued.

According to Judge Cote's 32-page decision, AP claimed, and the plaintiffs
conceded, that the use of "a legend on a check, may be effective to
transfer copyright under the proper circumstances." This point was
substantiated by case law cited in the decision.

Thus, the key issue in future cases will be the circumstances of check
endorsement as well as any agreements or understandings that were made prior to
receiving the check.

    [This case brings to light the fact that there are some instances where a
    check endorsement can actually transfer copyright. To the best of my knowledge
    the general understanding among non-lawyers in the industry has been that check
    legends were not sufficient to transfer copyright. This decision indicates the
    opposite may be true.

    Therefore, photographers should take care to scratch out all such legends before
    endorsing and depositing any checks. Future cases may provide a clearer
    understanding of what is and isn't permissible.]

"Although the ruling appears to be a preliminary victory for the AP, we are
confident that freelance photographers who oppose transfer of their copyright to
AP will ultimately prevail on this basic issue now that the court has indicated
individual photographers can prevail on the merits when they demonstrate there
was no intent to transfer copyright to AP," said Paul Hurschmann, NAFP executive
vice-president and a plaintiff in the suit.

Judge Cote also dismissed charges of antitrust, monopoly and restraint of trade
stating in effect that plaintiffs' allegations would establish that AP's conduct
could be detrimental to competitors (i.e. freelance photographers) but not to
competition itself, which is a prerequisite under the law.

A charge of copyright infringement by plaintiff Paul Hurschmann remains under
consideration. A similar charge of copyright infringement by plaintiff Kevin J.
Larkin was erroneously dismissed (AP did not ask for its dismissal and conceded
that it was properly brought).

Larkin's had applied for a copyright registration certificate, but had not
received the certificate prior to the court action.

Judge Cote said that a copyright infringement occurs only if the individual had
acquired a certificate of registration in advance from the U.S. Copyright
Office, and thus dismissed his application.

New charges are likely to be brought by several more individual plaintiffs
seeking a declaratory judgment on copyright ownership under guidelines outlined
in the decision, whereby individual plaintiffs could prevail on the merits of
individual claims.

"It is unfortunate that we must prolong our legal efforts, but we believe that
the law is on our side and we simply need to refocus our charges and our claims
as to what our entitlement to relief should be. This battle is by no means over.
The ultimate ownership of copyright to the images remains to be decided."

For more information and the full text of the decision see the NAFP web site at:

Copyright © 1998 Jim Pickerell. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-461-7627, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

Jim Pickerell is founder of, an online newsletter that publishes daily. He is also available for personal telephone consultations on pricing and other matters related to stock photography. He occasionally acts as an expert witness on matters related to stock photography. For his current curriculum vitae go to:  


Be the first to comment below.

Post Comment

Please log in or create an account to post comments.

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive email notification when new stories are posted.

Follow Us

Free Stuff

Stock Photo Pricing: The Future
In the last two years I have written a lot about stock photo pricing and its downward slide. If you have time over the holidays you may want to review some of these stories as you plan your strategy ...
Read More
Future Of Stock Photography
If you’re a photographer that counts on the licensing of stock images to provide a portion of your annual income the following are a few stories you should read. In the past decade stock photography ...
Read More
Blockchain Stories
The opening session at this year’s CEPIC Congress in Berlin on May 30, 2018 is entitled “Can Blockchain be applied to the Photo Industry?” For those who would like to know more about the existing blo...
Read More
2017 Stories Worth Reviewing
The following are links to some 2017 and early 2018 stories that might be worth reviewing as we move into the new year.
Read More
Stories Related To Stock Photo Pricing
The following are links to stories that deal with stock photo pricing trends. Probably the biggest problem the industry has faced in recent years has been the steady decline in prices for the use of ...
Read More
Stock Photo Prices: The Future
This story is FREE. Feel free to pass it along to anyone interested in licensing their work as stock photography. On October 23rd at the DMLA 2017 Conference in New York there will be a panel discuss...
Read More
Important Stock Photo Industry Issues
Here are links to recent stories that deal with three major issues for the stock photo industry – Revenue Growth Potential, Setting Bottom Line On Pricing and Future Production Sources.
Read More
Recent Stories – Summer 2016
If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
Read More
Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
Read More
Finding The Right Image
Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
Read More

More from Free Stuff