The Cost Of Producing Stock

Posted on 2/5/2014 by Jim Pickerell | Printable Version | Comments (1)

A couple weeks ago I proposed an adjustment to current agency pricing strategies that offers the potential to get higher prices for the images in greatest demand and still make large quantities of excellent images available to customers who can’t afford the best. (See “Solving The Problem Of Too Many Images”) Some subscribers thought I should also factor in production costs. Here's my response.

Get the Full Article (2 Credits)

Have an Account?

Access to this site is an exclusive benefit for you. Enter your username and password in the form above. If you don't remember your password you can reset it at any time.

Forgot your password?

New to Selling Stock?

Selling Stock is a subscription based on-line newsletter that reports on developing trends in the stock photo industry. It is updated at least twice a month. On-line subscribers receive e-mail notification whenever new stories are posted. Archives containing stories going back to late 1995 are fully available to subscribers.

Copyright © 2014 Jim Pickerell. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-251-0720, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

Jim Pickerell is founder of, an online newsletter that publishes daily. He is also available for personal telephone consultations on pricing and other matters related to stock photography. He occasionally acts as an expert witness on matters related to stock photography. For his current curriculum vitae go to:  


  • Tom Zimberoff Posted Feb 8, 2014
    "The agencies believe there will always be enough amateurs producing images that will satisfy the needs of their customers." Your comment, Jim, is certainly not the view of photo buyers. And by "buyers," I do not mean plumbers, dentists, bloggers, and designers looking to fill up Web sites with cheap content; but Ad agencies, Corporate communicators, Editorial media, and Small business (doing more than a $3M run rate).

    On the next issue you raised, cost of production, you wrote, "As far back as I can remember stock agencies have never taken the costs of producing images into account." Well, of course, that's because they had no direct data connection—and still do not have—with creators, say, in the cloud by which they could factor in creative costs balanced with buyer budgets utilizing predictive data analytics. Even so, the incumbent distributors deliberately chose, years ago, to serve only buyers—consumers at that—by employing low prices and volume sales. The photographers' costs were not only purposefully ignored but they, themselves, were cut out of the value chain. That was a business decision, not an unexpected result. Anyway, today, technologically, there is no difficulty at all in factoring in production costs into stock photo sales. Only the will to do so is lacking. Despite your saying, "That kind of communication between producer and the person negotiating the rights no longer exists. And, it cannot be reestablished in the high volume, time sensitive, Internet sales environment," is simply not true. It's quite straightforward to accomplish—transaction by transaction in real time.

    Finally, FotoQuote is likely the singularly most pernicious, dead weight on prices because it's based on guesses. Okay call it a survey. However:

    ? Surveys do not always account for more than a basic usage fee, yet there are usually additional kinds of fees and costs to consider in the bottom-line price of a photo shoot.

    ? Surveys can be skewed by the number of respondents, which may include only a small percentage of those photographers who were actually polled.

    ? The survey respondents from one regional market may outnumber those in another. If you’re not given that information, the survey will be tainted and misleading, because what might be a tantalizingly high fee in Schenectady might be low by New York City standards.

    ? Surveys become out of date as quickly as prices are susceptible to change.

    ? Buyers use survey results to keep a cap on usage fees.

    ? Finally, surveys do not single out photographers who have used best practices to determine pricing and profit structures. Consequently, any carelessness on the part of the respondents (especially the fewer there are) will lead to artificial prices, whether biased on the low side or the high side. You have no way of knowing how many, if any, of the respondents regularly mark up their billed expenses, let alone whether they billed any expenses at all. And you have no idea what their actual costs are.

Post Comment

You must log in to post comments.

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive our FREE weekly email listing new stories posted.

Follow Us

Free Stuff

Important Stock Photo Industry Issues
Here are links to recent stories that deal with three major issues for the stock photo industry – Revenue Growth Potential, Setting Bottom Line On Pricing and Future Production Sources.
Read More
Recent Stories – Summer 2016
If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
Read More
Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
Read More
Finding The Right Image
Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
Read More
Where Is The Stock Photo Industry Headed?
For new readers, or those who may have missed some of what I have written over the last few months, the following are a list of stories worth looking at to get a sense of where the industry is headed.
Read More
Photography As A Career
It’s that time of year when high school seniors are waiting for college acceptance letters and thinking about future careers. If you know someone who is thinking about photography as a career you mig...
Read More
2014 Stories You May Have Missed
For many the end of the year is a time to review past experiences and consider whether it makes sense to chart a new course in the year ahead. Stock photography has changed dramatically for professio...
Read More
More Stories In 2014 You May Have Missed
Every so often I put together a list of the most important stories we’ve published in the recent past. If you are engaged in the business of stock photography the links below are to stories that we’v...
Read More
Getty: A Three Month Review
In all the excitement about 35 million FREE images it is worth looking back at some of things that have been happening at Getty Images in the last three months. After watching revenue decline for the...
Read More
State Of Stock Photo Industry: 2013
If you’re looking for an overview of the state of the stock photo industry as of October 2013 the stories listed below are a good place to start. Regular readers of Selling-Stock will have seen all t...
Read More

More from Free Stuff