What Is the Value of Copyright?

Posted on 12/15/2008 by Jim Pickerell | Printable Version | Comments (1)

The grim outcome of Greenberg vs. The National Geographic Society should be of deep concern to every photographer who believes copyright offers legal protection. Rather, this case teaches us two things: the law is not always fair or equitable, and those who have deeper pockets tend to win.

I disagree with my colleague who argued, “Photographers’ only remaining option is to negotiate all potential future uses at the time of commission and to put the results of such negotiations into non-ambiguously worded contracts.” In my opinion, there is nothing whatsoever photographers can do to protect themselves from being exploited in this way.

If there was ever a photographer who dotted all the Is and crossed all the Ts in executing a contract for photographic work, it was Jerry Greenberg. His written agreement with the National Geographic Society said that for the fee he was paid he was licensing only the rights to publish his work in a single edition of the printed magazine. If NGS wanted to use his work in any other way, it would be necessary to compensate him for that use.

Greenberg also had letters from NGS transferring the copyright back to him. It should be noted that these images were used by NGS before the passage of the 1976 Copyright Act. At that time, copyright rested with the organization paying for the work and not the creator. as it does today. Thus, the formal transfer of copyright back to Greenberg was extremely important.

Greenberg had the images registered with the Copyright Office years before “The Complete National Geographic: 108 Years of National Geographic Magazine” CD-ROM discs were created. Robert Gilka, retired NGS director of photography and the man who hired Greenberg to do the work, testified that it was his intention to use the images only in the magazine and pay an additional fee for any other use.

The discovery process revealed that the discs containing Greenberg’s pictures—and the pictures of every other photographer who had ever had images published by National Geographic—generated over $70 million in revenues for the publisher.

In the 1960s and early 1970s, the idea of such a thing as a CD-ROM disc that could hold images was inconceivable, as was the idea of delivering images online. Stock photographers cannot anticipate and spell out all possible future uses of their images 30, 40 or 50 years down the road. All they can do if carefully define exactly the rights that are being licensed at the moment and stipulate that all other rights are reserved.

Rumor has it that pursuing this case has cost Greenberg over $200,000 in legal fees. Greenberg’s attorney Norman Davis, the senior counsel of Squire, Sauders & Dempsey, said that his client did this not only for himself but to look after the interests of other creatives. “In pursuing this cause, he has exhausted virtually all of his means,” Davis added.

Photographers owe Greenberg a tremendous debt of thanks. Hopefully, they will take the lessons of this case to heart. If the infringer is a small organization without a lot of resources to pursue legal action, and the photographer has the copyright registered, he may get an out-of-court settlement, or at least keep legal costs to a minimum. Infringers with deep pockets will eventually get their way, even if it takes 11 years, regardless of what might be fair or equitable.

Copyright © 2008 Jim Pickerell. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-251-0720, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

Jim Pickerell is founder of www.selling-stock.com, an online newsletter that publishes daily. He is also available for personal telephone consultations on pricing and other matters related to stock photography. He occasionally acts as an expert witness on matters related to stock photography. For his current curriculum vitae go to: http://www.jimpickerell.com/Curriculum-Vitae.aspx.  


  • Rio Helmi Posted Dec 15, 2008

    Just curious why you say an unambiguous contract is not any protection - is it because it doesn't hold up to the letter of the law/not binding or because the courts are not just? In my opinion the court made a very bad judgement given all the evidence, and though I am no legal expert, but a contract that is as specific as you outline should be upheld by the law.

Post Comment

You must log in to post comments.

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive our FREE weekly email listing new stories posted.

Follow Us

Free Stuff

Recent Stories – Summer 2016
If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
Read More
Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
Read More
Finding The Right Image
Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
Read More
Where Is The Stock Photo Industry Headed?
For new readers, or those who may have missed some of what I have written over the last few months, the following are a list of stories worth looking at to get a sense of where the industry is headed.
Read More
Photography As A Career
It’s that time of year when high school seniors are waiting for college acceptance letters and thinking about future careers. If you know someone who is thinking about photography as a career you mig...
Read More
2014 Stories You May Have Missed
For many the end of the year is a time to review past experiences and consider whether it makes sense to chart a new course in the year ahead. Stock photography has changed dramatically for professio...
Read More
More Stories In 2014 You May Have Missed
Every so often I put together a list of the most important stories we’ve published in the recent past. If you are engaged in the business of stock photography the links below are to stories that we’v...
Read More
Getty: A Three Month Review
In all the excitement about 35 million FREE images it is worth looking back at some of things that have been happening at Getty Images in the last three months. After watching revenue decline for the...
Read More
State Of Stock Photo Industry: 2013
If you’re looking for an overview of the state of the stock photo industry as of October 2013 the stories listed below are a good place to start. Regular readers of Selling-Stock will have seen all t...
Read More
Education Market Shifts To Digital
If supplying pictures for educational use is a significant part of your business plan you need to be aware of how the market is trending toward digital delivery and how that is likely to affect the p...
Read More

More from Free Stuff