Will Getty Insist On Keeping Contributors In The Dark?

Posted on 3/11/2014 by Jim Pickerell | Printable Version | Comments (1)

Photographers, illustrators, Getty’s Image Partners (stock agencies), and trade associations representing Getty photographers should be asking Getty to supply creators with a limited amount of the data collected when Getty embeds creator's images on a web site for FREE.

These image creators supplied Getty with their images for the purpose of licensing, not free giveaways. Now, Getty had decided to make the image available at no charge to certain Internet users in exchange for being able to collect data from the user's web site.

At the very least, image creator are morally entitled to know which images have been embedded.

I asked Getty if they planned to inform contributors of the image numbers of embedded images, and the URLs. Their official answer was:
     “At launch, we will not be sharing information of this manner with contributors, but we will explore data sharing options in the future. If and when we earn revenue associated with an embedded image (e.g., ads placed in the embedded viewer), we will report that revenue to contributors through existing royalty reports.”
I would recommend that contributors contact Craig Peters, Senior Vice President of business development, product and content at Getty Images with the following request:

    Dear Mr. Peters:

    I am not happy with Getty’s recent decision to supply my images to web users free of charge. I supplied the images to Getty Images for the purpose of licensing with the understanding that I would receive a royalty whenever the image was licensed. While there is also an understanding that selected images could be used in a limited way for marketing, I never envisioned that there would be a massive give away with the primary purpose of collecting data from users.

    Nevertheless, I would request that you inform me on a monthly basis of the image number of each of my images that has been embedded in the previous month, and the number of times each was embedded. To the degree that I can better understand what web users are looking for, it will help me in planning future shoots.

    It would also be helpful to know the URL where the image is being used so that I might have a better understanding of how the image is being used.

    Thank you for your consideration.


    (Feel free to copy and paste this suggested language into an email to Peters and to recommend that your friends do likewise.)
If Getty receives enough comments from contributors it might influence their decision about supplying information. It would be easy enough for Getty to supply this information to contributors, at virtually no cost, if they could recognize a benefit.

If contributors have no information about how frequently their images are being used they will assume the worst. In fact, there are likely to be many contributors who will have few, if any, images embedded, simply because of the nature of their collections. Some of these contributors may hold back from supplying new images simply out of an unfounded fear. That is not in Getty’s best interest and they could solve the problem by sharing information with their contributors.

My guess is that pictures of entertainers and sports figures will be embedded frequently as will pictures of food and travel. I suspect there will be less demand for business and office situation, but who knows. The more image creators can understand the level of demand for these uses, the more they will be likely to supply the right kind of images that will allow Getty’s data collection business to grow.

Certainly some users will strip out the copyright notice and the Getty logo because it is distracting. This is a violation of Getty’s terms of use, but it seems unlikely that Getty will have the staff to check all the images that are embedded. Many suppliers would check the URLs if they know where their images are being used, and inform Getty when they find an unauthorized use. This would seem to be a benefit to Getty.

From a purely public relations point of view with their suppliers, if Getty were willing to share some information with suppliers it could go a long way to defusing the initial hostile reaction to the embedding strategy.

Copyright © 2014 Jim Pickerell. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-461-7627, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

Jim Pickerell is founder of www.selling-stock.com, an online newsletter that publishes daily. He is also available for personal telephone consultations on pricing and other matters related to stock photography. He occasionally acts as an expert witness on matters related to stock photography. For his current curriculum vitae go to: http://www.jimpickerell.com/Curriculum-Vitae.aspx.  


  • Bill Bachmann Posted Mar 11, 2014
    Hoping that Getty will supply any important information to the REAL owners of images they are giving away is like hoping that your ex-wife will speak highly of you to your new girlfriend! They feel they can do anything without any permission -- and that is WRONG!


Post Comment

Please log in or create an account to post comments.

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive email notification when new stories are posted.

Follow Us

Free Stuff

Stock Photo Pricing: The Future
In the last two years I have written a lot about stock photo pricing and its downward slide. If you have time over the holidays you may want to review some of these stories as you plan your strategy ...
Read More
Future Of Stock Photography
If you’re a photographer that counts on the licensing of stock images to provide a portion of your annual income the following are a few stories you should read. In the past decade stock photography ...
Read More
Blockchain Stories
The opening session at this year’s CEPIC Congress in Berlin on May 30, 2018 is entitled “Can Blockchain be applied to the Photo Industry?” For those who would like to know more about the existing blo...
Read More
2017 Stories Worth Reviewing
The following are links to some 2017 and early 2018 stories that might be worth reviewing as we move into the new year.
Read More
Stories Related To Stock Photo Pricing
The following are links to stories that deal with stock photo pricing trends. Probably the biggest problem the industry has faced in recent years has been the steady decline in prices for the use of ...
Read More
Stock Photo Prices: The Future
This story is FREE. Feel free to pass it along to anyone interested in licensing their work as stock photography. On October 23rd at the DMLA 2017 Conference in New York there will be a panel discuss...
Read More
Important Stock Photo Industry Issues
Here are links to recent stories that deal with three major issues for the stock photo industry – Revenue Growth Potential, Setting Bottom Line On Pricing and Future Production Sources.
Read More
Recent Stories – Summer 2016
If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
Read More
Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
Read More
Finding The Right Image
Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
Read More

More from Free Stuff