Strategy for Use-Based Pricing Misunderstood

Posted on 8/5/2010 by Jim Pickerell | Printable Version | Comments (3)

When I was recently interviewed by Photonetcast, it became clear that my position on the best strategy for licensing rights to images is misunderstood, so it is time for another explanation. Granted, my position is radical, so bear with me.

Get the Full Article (2 Credits)

Have an Account?

Access to this site is an exclusive benefit for you. Enter your username and password in the form above. If you don't remember your password you can reset it at any time.

Forgot your password?

New to Selling Stock?

Selling Stock is a subscription based on-line newsletter that reports on developing trends in the stock photo industry. It is updated at least twice a month. On-line subscribers receive e-mail notification whenever new stories are posted. Archives containing stories going back to late 1995 are fully available to subscribers.

Copyright © Jim Pickerell. The above article may not be copied, reproduced, excerpted or distributed in any manner without written permission from the author. All requests should be submitted to Selling Stock at 10319 Westlake Drive, Suite 162, Bethesda, MD 20817, phone 301-251-0720, e-mail: wvz@fpcubgbf.pbz

Jim Pickerell is founder of, an online newsletter that publishes daily. He is also available for personal telephone consultations on pricing and other matters related to stock photography. He occasionally acts as an expert witness on matters related to stock photography. For his current curriculum vitae go to:  


  • Mark Turner Posted Aug 5, 2010
    While your proposal to eliminate exclusive licenses is a bit radical, it's one I can live with. I've sold exactly one exclusive license since 1995 and that was at the height of the internet boom.

    What particularly concerns me is the low-price part of the market. It costs me just as much to create, market, and deliver an image for a $10, $100, or $1000 license fee. I just don't want to bother with the $10 fees because my time is worth more than that. I license images direct from my office and through three agencies. Those agencies would make more money, along with me, if they said "no" to very low cost licenses. I wonder how they can even cover their overhead on some of the licenses that appear on my statements. What's the transaction cost for online delivery of an image when the fee collected is less than $5?

  • John Harris Posted Aug 6, 2010
    Quite so Mark- I'm not at all convinced that the Wal-Marts of photography have themselves made money out of "buying market share" with ever lowering prices. The business model undermines the content.

  • Jim Pickerell Posted Aug 6, 2010
    Mark and John you're not looking at the statistics. There is nothing wrong with the low priced segment if you sell enough volume at a low enough transaction cost to make up for it. The Internet and web transactions have dramatically reduced transaction costs to the point that they are negligible.

    As Tom Grill says in his article "50 X $200 = 200 X $50" ( What he should have said is "20 X $250 = 1,000 X $5" because that is closer to the actual sales ratios when you compare moderately successful RM shooters with moderately successful microstock shooters today.

Post Comment

You must log in to post comments.

Stay Connected

Sign up to receive our FREE weekly email listing new stories posted.

Follow Us

Free Stuff

Recent Stories – Summer 2016
If you’ve been shooting all summer and haven’t had time to keep up with your reading here are links to a few stories you might want to check out as we move into the fall. To begin, be sure to complet...
Read More
Corbis Acquisition by VCG/Getty Images
This story provides links to several stories that relate to the Visual China Group (VCG) acquisition of Corbis and the role Getty Images has been assigned in the transfer of Corbis assets to the Gett...
Read More
Finding The Right Image
Many think search will be solved with better Metadata. While metadata is important, there are limits to how far it can take the customer toward finding the right piece of content. This story provides...
Read More
Where Is The Stock Photo Industry Headed?
For new readers, or those who may have missed some of what I have written over the last few months, the following are a list of stories worth looking at to get a sense of where the industry is headed.
Read More
Photography As A Career
It’s that time of year when high school seniors are waiting for college acceptance letters and thinking about future careers. If you know someone who is thinking about photography as a career you mig...
Read More
2014 Stories You May Have Missed
For many the end of the year is a time to review past experiences and consider whether it makes sense to chart a new course in the year ahead. Stock photography has changed dramatically for professio...
Read More
More Stories In 2014 You May Have Missed
Every so often I put together a list of the most important stories we’ve published in the recent past. If you are engaged in the business of stock photography the links below are to stories that we’v...
Read More
Getty: A Three Month Review
In all the excitement about 35 million FREE images it is worth looking back at some of things that have been happening at Getty Images in the last three months. After watching revenue decline for the...
Read More
State Of Stock Photo Industry: 2013
If you’re looking for an overview of the state of the stock photo industry as of October 2013 the stories listed below are a good place to start. Regular readers of Selling-Stock will have seen all t...
Read More
Education Market Shifts To Digital
If supplying pictures for educational use is a significant part of your business plan you need to be aware of how the market is trending toward digital delivery and how that is likely to affect the p...
Read More

More from Free Stuff